Stephen Pan

62 papers receiving 1k citations

Peers

Stephen Pan
Comparison fields: 5 of 89
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 326
  • Internal Medicine 22
  • Biomedical Engineering 155
  • Surgery 160
  • Infectious Diseases 69
Replace Brent J. Barber with:
Brent J. Barber United States
Silverio Sbrana Italy
Sarah E. Topol United States
Atif Zafar United States
Koshi Kinoshita Japan
Ewa Żekanowska Poland
Tomotsugu Yasuda Japan
Yee‐Man Lau Hong Kong
Holger Seidel Germany
Ralf Harun Zwick Austria
Stephen Pan relative to Brent J. Barber United States Brent J. Barber's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×5.1×
Brent J. Barber · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Stephen Pan

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen Pan's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen Pan with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen Pan more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen Pan

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen Pan. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen Pan. The network helps show where Stephen Pan may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Stephen Pan, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Stephen Pan Line = papers co-authored together Stephen Pan links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 67 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202297
2 202090
3 201278
4 201368
5 201359
6 202259
7 200556
8 201249
9 200542
10 201541
11 201438
12 201529
13 202227
14 202327
15 202224
16 201620
17 202020
18 202320
19 202418
20 202016

About Stephen Pan

Stephen Pan is a scholar working on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Biomedical Engineering, Surgery, Genetics and Physiology, having authored 67 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices (19 papers), Cardiomyopathy and Myosin Studies (12 papers), Transplantation: Methods and Outcomes (10 papers), Heart Failure Treatment and Management (5 papers), Amyloidosis: Diagnosis, Treatment, Outcomes (5 papers), Genomics and Rare Diseases (4 papers), Genetic Associations and Epidemiology (4 papers) and COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (326 citations), Internal Medicine (22 citations), Biomedical Engineering (155 citations), Surgery (160 citations) and Infectious Diseases (69 citations). Stephen Pan has collaborated with scholars based in United States, France and Japan. Frequent co-authors include Euan Angus Ashley, Stephen R. Quake, Matthew T. Wheeler, Frederick E. Dewey, Masashi Kai, Suguru Ohira, Gregg M. Lanier, Vladimir A. Tyurin, Qinghua Liang and Teresa G. Hastings. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation, Cardiology in Review, Artificial Organs, Circulation Heart Failure and JAMA.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact