Stephen Oney
Impact in
- Human-Computer Interaction top 2%
- Interactive and Immersive Displays
- Usability and User Interface Design
- Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
- Software top 5%
- Software Testing and Debugging Techniques
Papers in
- Software 7
- Software Testing and Debugging Techniques 4
- Spreadsheets and End-User Computing 3
-
- Usability and User Interface Design 4
- Interactive and Immersive Displays 3
- Innovative Human-Technology Interaction 2
- Co-authors
- Brad A. Myers (9 shared papers)Joel Brandt (6 shared papers)Jason Wiese (1 shared paper)Chris Harrison (1 shared paper)Amy Ogan (1 shared paper)Tao Xie (2 shared papers)Rahul Pandita (2 shared papers)Xusheng Xiao (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- Lecture notes in computer science (1 paper)Figshare (1 paper)International Conference on Software Engineering (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesChina
In The Last Decade
Stephen Oney
15 papers receiving 592 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 41
- Human-Computer Interaction 230
- Software 159
- Computer Science Applications 93
- Information Systems 306
- Signal Processing 77
Countries citing papers authored by Stephen Oney
This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen Oney's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen Oney with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen Oney more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen Oney
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen Oney. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen Oney. The network helps show where Stephen Oney may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 22 scholars most cited alongside Stephen Oney, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2013 | 153 | |
| 2 | 2012 | 94 | |
| 3 | 2012 | 89 | |
| 4 | 2010 | 63 | |
| 5 | 2009 | 62 | |
| 6 | 2012 | 41 | |
| 7 | 2012 | 31 | |
| 8 | 2014 | 29 | |
| 9 | 2016 | 24 | |
| 10 | 2017 | 14 | |
| 11 | 2013 | 2 | |
| 12 | Creativity support in authoring and backtracking | 2013 | 2 |
| 13 | 2018 | 1 | |
| 14 | 2011 | 1 | |
| 15 | 2013 | 1 |
About Stephen Oney
Stephen Oney is a scholar working on Software, Human-Computer Interaction, Information Systems, Computer Science Applications and Developmental and Educational Psychology, having authored 15 papers that have together received 607 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Software Engineering Research (6 papers), Software Testing and Debugging Techniques (4 papers), Usability and User Interface Design (4 papers), Spreadsheets and End-User Computing (3 papers), Interactive and Immersive Displays (3 papers), Data Visualization and Analytics (2 papers), Teaching and Learning Programming (2 papers) and Innovative Human-Technology Interaction (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Human-Computer Interaction (230 citations), Software (159 citations), Computer Science Applications (93 citations), Information Systems (306 citations) and Signal Processing (77 citations). Stephen Oney has collaborated with scholars based in United States and China. Frequent co-authors include Brad A. Myers, Joel Brandt, Jason Wiese, Chris Harrison, Amy Ogan, Tao Xie, Rahul Pandita, Xusheng Xiao, Amit M. Paradkar and Hao Zhong. Their work appears in journals such as Lecture notes in computer science, Figshare and International Conference on Software Engineering.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.