Stephen Maitzen
Impact in
- Philosophy top 0.5%
- Theology and Philosophy of Evil
- Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
- Health top 10%
- Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
Papers in
- Philosophy 25
- Theology and Philosophy of Evil 14
- Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics 7
- War, Ethics, and Justification 4
- Karl Barth and Christian Theology 3
- Co-authors
- William P. Alston (1 shared paper)J. L. Schellenberg (1 shared paper)Andrew Graham (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Religious Studies (3 papers)Philosophy and Phenomenological Research (2 papers)Sophia (2 papers)International Journal for Philosophy of Religion (2 papers)Philosophia (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- CanadaUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Stephen Maitzen
25 papers receiving 414 citations
Stephen Maitzen's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 57
- Philosophy 336
- Health 72
- Religious studies 41
- History and Philosophy of Science 32
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 89
Countries citing papers authored by Stephen Maitzen
This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen Maitzen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen Maitzen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen Maitzen more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen Maitzen
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen Maitzen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen Maitzen. The network helps show where Stephen Maitzen may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 3 scholars most cited alongside Stephen Maitzen, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 29 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Perceiving God: The Epistemology of Religious Experience. Hit paper breakdown → | 1993 | 164 |
| 2 | 2008 | 104 | |
| 3 | 1995 | 68 | |
| 4 | 2006 | 37 | |
| 5 | 2009 | 18 | |
| 6 | 1995 | 16 | |
| 7 | 2008 | 11 | |
| 8 | 1991 | 10 | |
| 9 | 2008 | 10 | |
| 10 | 1998 | 8 | |
| 11 | 2007 | 8 | |
| 12 | 1998 | 6 | |
| 13 | 2007 | 6 | |
| 14 | 2003 | 5 | |
| 15 | 2011 | 5 | |
| 16 | 2007 | 4 | |
| 17 | 1995 | 3 | |
| 18 | 2008 | 3 | |
| 19 | 1997 | 2 | |
| 20 | 2005 | 2 |
About Stephen Maitzen
Stephen Maitzen is a scholar working on Philosophy, Sociology and Political Science, Political Science and International Relations, Social Psychology and Health, having authored 29 papers that have together received 497 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Theology and Philosophy of Evil (14 papers), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (7 papers), Paranormal Experiences and Beliefs (4 papers), War, Ethics, and Justification (4 papers), Philosophy and Theoretical Science (3 papers), Political Philosophy and Ethics (3 papers), Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology (3 papers) and Karl Barth and Christian Theology (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (336 citations), Health (72 citations), Religious studies (41 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (32 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (89 citations). Stephen Maitzen has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include William P. Alston, J. L. Schellenberg and Andrew Graham. Their work appears in journals such as Religious Studies, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, Sophia, International Journal for Philosophy of Religion and Philosophia.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.