Stephen M. Pollock

53 papers receiving 887 citations

Peers

Stephen M. Pollock
Comparison fields: 5 of 116
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 143
  • General Decision Sciences 34
  • Virology 78
  • Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering 143
  • Management Science and Operations Research 174
Replace Raimondo Manca with:
Raimondo Manca Italy
Jacques Janssen Italy
Milton Sobel United States
Russell Cheng United Kingdom
Sandeep Juneja India
Pranab K. Sen United States
Morton Klein United States
Abhijit Deshmukh United States
Marek J. Drużdżel United States
G. S. Mahapatra India
Stephen M. Pollock relative to Raimondo Manca Italy Raimondo Manca's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×11.3×
Raimondo Manca · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Stephen M. Pollock

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen M. Pollock's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen M. Pollock with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen M. Pollock more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen M. Pollock

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen M. Pollock. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen M. Pollock. The network helps show where Stephen M. Pollock may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Stephen M. Pollock, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Stephen M. Pollock Line = papers co-authored together Stephen M. Pollock links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 56 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1997184
2 198876
3 197066
4 198858
5 197447
6 200240
7 198232
8 200527
9 196826
10 200526
11 199224
12 199022
13 198021
14 197120
15 198620
16 200919
17 201217
18 196817
19 198016
20 200616

About Stephen M. Pollock

Stephen M. Pollock is a scholar working on Management Information Systems, Management Science and Operations Research, Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, Artificial Intelligence and Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality, having authored 56 papers that have together received 973 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Queuing Theory Analysis (5 papers), Advanced Statistical Process Monitoring (5 papers), Supply Chain and Inventory Management (4 papers), Scheduling and Optimization Algorithms (4 papers), Reliability and Maintenance Optimization (4 papers), Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques (3 papers), Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications (3 papers) and Risk and Safety Analysis (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (143 citations), General Decision Sciences (34 citations), Virology (78 citations), Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering (143 citations) and Management Science and Operations Research (174 citations). Stephen M. Pollock has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and South Korea. Frequent co-authors include Damodar Y. Golhar, Lisa M. Maillart, Daniel Barth-Jones, Betsy Foxman, Andrew L. Adams, Kenneth Lange, John A. Jacquez, James S. Koopman, Hyoseong Lee and Craig W. Kirkwood. Their work appears in journals such as Operations Research, Physics in Medicine and Biology, IEEE Transactions on Reliability, Management Science and INFORMS Journal on Applied Analytics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact