Stephen M. Pollock

59 papers receiving 1.0k citations

Peers

Stephen M. Pollock
Comparison fields: 5 of 125
  • General Decision Sciences 74
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 159
  • Virology 84
  • Management Science and Operations Research 211
  • Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering 159
Replace Raimondo Manca with:
Raimondo Manca Italy
Peter Haddawy Thailand
Jacques Janssen Italy
Sandeep Juneja India
Milton Sobel United States
Pranab K. Sen United States
Russell Cheng United Kingdom
Marek J. Drużdżel United States
D. Hertz Israel
Abhijit Deshmukh United States
Stephen M. Pollock relative to Raimondo Manca Italy Raimondo Manca's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15×20×24.7×
Raimondo Manca · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Stephen M. Pollock

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen M. Pollock's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen M. Pollock with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen M. Pollock more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen M. Pollock

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen M. Pollock. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen M. Pollock. The network helps show where Stephen M. Pollock may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Stephen M. Pollock, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Stephen M. Pollock Line = papers co-authored together Stephen M. Pollock links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 63 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1997193
2 198881
3 198279
4 197067
5 198865
6 197451
7 200242
8 196832
9 200528
10 199227
11 200826
12 200526
13 199023
14 198023
15 198623
16 197120
17 200919
18 198019
19 196818
20 199317

About Stephen M. Pollock

Stephen M. Pollock is a scholar working on Management Information Systems, Management Science and Operations Research, Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, Artificial Intelligence and Statistics and Probability, having authored 63 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Queuing Theory Analysis (6 papers), Supply Chain and Inventory Management (5 papers), Scheduling and Optimization Algorithms (5 papers), Advanced Statistical Process Monitoring (5 papers), Reliability and Maintenance Optimization (4 papers), Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques (3 papers), Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications (3 papers) and Risk and Safety Analysis (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Decision Sciences (74 citations), Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (159 citations), Virology (84 citations), Management Science and Operations Research (211 citations) and Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering (159 citations). Stephen M. Pollock has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and South Korea. Frequent co-authors include Damodar Y. Golhar, Craig W. Kirkwood, Lisa M. Maillart, Andrew L. Adams, John A. Jacquez, Daniel Barth-Jones, Betsy Foxman, James S. Koopman, Kenneth Lange and Hyoseong Lee. Their work appears in journals such as Operations Research, IEEE Transactions on Reliability, INFORMS Journal on Applied Analytics, Physics in Medicine and Biology and Management Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact