Stephen M. Highstein

109 papers receiving 5.1k citations

Peers

Stephen M. Highstein
Comparison fields: 5 of 118
  • Neurology 3.4k
  • Sensory Systems 1.6k
  • Ophthalmology 840
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 531
  • Developmental Biology 172
Replace J. I. Simpson with:
J. I. Simpson United States
Victor J. Wilson United States
J. M. Goldberg United States
W. Precht Germany
Kathleen E. Cullen Canada
R. A. McCrea United States
Stephen G. Lisberger United States
Vicente Honrubia United States
John K. Harting United States
Jan Voogd Netherlands
Stephen M. Highstein relative to J. I. Simpson United States J. I. Simpson's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
J. I. Simpson · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Stephen M. Highstein

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen M. Highstein's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen M. Highstein with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen M. Highstein more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen M. Highstein

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen M. Highstein. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen M. Highstein. The network helps show where Stephen M. Highstein may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Stephen M. Highstein, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Stephen M. Highstein Line = papers co-authored together Stephen M. Highstein links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 113 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1987274
2 1988198
3 1975148
4 1995146
5 1973123
6 1987120
7 2005118
8 1972108
9 1973108
10 1975105
11 1977102
12 200196
13 197096
14 197593
15 197893
16 200288
17 198282
18 197081
19 201177
20 198675

About Stephen M. Highstein

Stephen M. Highstein is a scholar working on Neurology, Sensory Systems, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Ophthalmology, having authored 113 papers that have together received 5.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Vestibular and auditory disorders (75 papers), Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics (41 papers), Ophthalmology and Eye Disorders (25 papers), Glaucoma and retinal disorders (21 papers), Marine animal studies overview (19 papers), Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (11 papers), Neuroscience of respiration and sleep (10 papers) and Visual perception and processing mechanisms (10 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Neurology (3.4k citations), Sensory Systems (1.6k citations), Ophthalmology (840 citations), Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (531 citations) and Developmental Biology (172 citations). Stephen M. Highstein has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Japan and Russia. Frequent co-authors include R. Baker, Richard D. Rabbitt, R. A. McCrea, A. M. Partsalis, Gay R. Holstein, Andrew M. Strassman, Yutaka Hirata, Adonis Moschovakis, H. Reisine and Makoto Ito. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Neurophysiology, Brain Research, The Journal of Comparative Neurology, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences and Experimental Brain Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact