Stephen Luke

479 citations
10 papers · 28 · h-index 4

Impact in

Papers in

    • Parathyroid Disorders and Treatments 1
    • Software Engineering Research 2
    • Software Engineering Techniques and Practices 1

Stephen Luke

8 papers receiving 25 citations

Peers

Stephen Luke
Comparison fields: 5 of 22
  • Management Science and Operations Research 9
  • Management of Technology and Innovation 5
  • Nephrology 4
  • Strategy and Management 7
  • Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering 4
Replace L. Salmi with:
L. Salmi Italy
A. Parameswaran Sri Lanka
S. C. Lin Taiwan
M. Oh South Korea
J. W. Bowyer Australia
A. Sánchez
D. Lehmann Germany
Stephen Luke relative to L. Salmi Italy L. Salmi's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×
L. Salmi · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Stephen Luke

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen Luke's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen Luke with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen Luke more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen Luke

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen Luke. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen Luke. The network helps show where Stephen Luke may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 22 scholars most cited alongside Stephen Luke, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Stephen Luke Line = papers co-authored together Stephen Luke links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

10 of 10 papers shown
#Work
1 20255
2 19955
3
A review of the role of middle management in developing innovation climate in construction support services organisations
20095
4 20243
5 20023
6 19933
7 19932
8
Identifying the factors that influence innovation championing behaviour in construction support services organisations: a review of the role of middle management
20102
9 20250
10 20190

About Stephen Luke

Stephen Luke is a scholar working on Nephrology, Information Systems, Management Science and Operations Research, Software and Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, having authored 10 papers that have together received 28 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Construction Project Management and Performance (2 papers), Software Reliability and Analysis Research (2 papers), Software Engineering Research (2 papers), Quality Function Deployment in Product Design (1 paper), Parathyroid Disorders and Treatments (1 paper), Risk and Safety Analysis (1 paper), Software Engineering Techniques and Practices (1 paper) and Organizational Leadership and Management Strategies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Management Science and Operations Research (9 citations), Management of Technology and Innovation (5 citations), Nephrology (4 citations), Strategy and Management (7 citations) and Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering (4 citations). Stephen Luke has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and Ghana. Frequent co-authors include Roy Payne, Andrew Dainty, Antony Attokaran, Mahesh Ramanan, Kevin B. Laupland, Manoj Saxena, Peter Garrett, James McCullough, Julieann Coombes and Denzil Gill. Their work appears in journals such as Engineering Management Journal, Intensive Care Medicine, Critical Care and Resuscitation, Anaesthesia Critical Care & Pain Medicine and Naval Engineers Journal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact