Stephen Leider

44 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

Stephen Leider
Comparison fields: 5 of 94
  • General Decision Sciences 216
  • Safety Research 532
  • Management Information Systems 156
  • Management Science and Operations Research 201
  • Demography 152
Replace Abdolkarim Sadrieh with:
Abdolkarim Sadrieh Germany
Dirk Sliwka Germany
Jen Shang United States
Tanjim Hossain Canada
Cary Deck United States
Hideo Owan Japan
Olivier Armantier United States
Alexander L. Brown United States
Atul Mitra United States
Justin Sydnor United States
Stephen Leider relative to Abdolkarim Sadrieh Germany Abdolkarim Sadrieh's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
Abdolkarim Sadrieh · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Stephen Leider

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen Leider's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen Leider with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen Leider more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen Leider

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen Leider. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen Leider. The network helps show where Stephen Leider may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Stephen Leider, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Stephen Leider Line = papers co-authored together Stephen Leider links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 47 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2009262
2 201195
3 201665
4 201764
5 201263
6 200956
7 201049
8 200845
9 201644
10 201837
11 201133
12 201728
13 200828
14 201728
15 201025
16 201423
17 202322
18 201522
19 201021
20 201020

About Stephen Leider

Stephen Leider is a scholar working on Safety Research, Management Science and Operations Research, Economics and Econometrics, Management Information Systems and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 47 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (29 papers), Supply Chain and Inventory Management (10 papers), Auction Theory and Applications (8 papers), Culture, Economy, and Development Studies (7 papers), Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems (6 papers), Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (6 papers), Corporate Finance and Governance (5 papers) and Game Theory and Applications (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Decision Sciences (216 citations), Safety Research (532 citations), Management Information Systems (156 citations), Management Science and Operations Research (201 citations) and Demography (152 citations). Stephen Leider has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and Singapore. Frequent co-authors include Quoc-Anh Do, Markus Möbius, Tanya Rosenblat, Judd B. Kessler, Florian Englmaier, Ian Larkin, Greg Barron, William S. Lovejoy, Alvin E. Roth and Hyun‐Soo Ahn. Their work appears in journals such as Management Science, Journal of the European Economic Association, Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, American Economic Journal Microeconomics and Review of Industrial Organization.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact