Stephen James Smith

84 papers receiving 2.2k citations

Peers

Stephen James Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 141
  • Complementary and alternative medicine 320
  • Ophthalmology 300
  • Sensory Systems 120
  • Nutrition and Dietetics 185
  • Molecular Medicine 54
Replace Takashi Seki with:
Takashi Seki Japan
Akiko Matsumoto Japan
Robert C. Hastings United States
Irene Riezzo Italy
Ruth D. Lipman United States
Jun Seob Song China
Suleyman AYDIN Türkiye
Nan Li China
Christian Höcht Argentina
Dan Zhang China
Stephen James Smith relative to Takashi Seki Japan Takashi Seki's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×7.7×
Takashi Seki · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Stephen James Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen James Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen James Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen James Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen James Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen James Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen James Smith. The network helps show where Stephen James Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Stephen James Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Stephen James Smith Line = papers co-authored together Stephen James Smith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 91 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2007376
2 2019163
3
Volatile organic compounds as diagnostic biomarkers in gastrointestinal and liver diseases.
2009148
4 2013101
5 201976
6 201374
7 201063
8 201554
9 201352
10 202152
11 198749
12 202145
13 200844
14 200043
15 201238
16 201938
17 202137
18 202035
19 201935
20 198034

About Stephen James Smith

Stephen James Smith is a scholar working on Complementary and alternative medicine, Ophthalmology, Oncology, Nutrition and Dietetics and Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, having authored 91 papers that have together received 2.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Saffron Plant Research Studies (6 papers), Phytochemicals and Medicinal Plants (5 papers), Superconducting and THz Device Technology (5 papers), Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy (4 papers), Sympathectomy and Hyperhidrosis Treatments (4 papers), Ocular Oncology and Treatments (4 papers), Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism (4 papers) and Hormonal and reproductive studies (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Complementary and alternative medicine (320 citations), Ophthalmology (300 citations), Sensory Systems (120 citations), Nutrition and Dietetics (185 citations) and Molecular Medicine (54 citations). Stephen James Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Adrian L. Lopresti, Peter D. Drummond, Brian D. Smith, Christopher S. Probert, Catherine E. Garner, Ben de Lacy Costello, Paul White, Robert C Spencer, Brian G. Mohney and Barrie Shannon. Their work appears in journals such as British Journal of Ophthalmology, Frontiers in Nutrition, Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology, Ophthalmology and Nutrients.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact