Stephen J. Shoemaker

827 citations
33 papers · 142 · h-index 7

Impact in

  • Classics top 5%
    • Byzantine Studies and History
    • Medieval Literature and History
  • Archeology top 5%
    • Archaeology and Historical Studies

Papers in

Stephen J. Shoemaker

21 papers receiving 79 citations

Peers

Stephen J. Shoemaker
Comparison fields: 5 of 21
  • Classics 50
  • Archeology 68
  • Religious studies 29
  • Anthropology 34
  • History 33
Replace Blake Leyerle with:
Blake Leyerle United States
Judith Herrin United Kingdom
Annabel Jane Wharton United States
Richard Valantasis United States
Guy MacLean Rogers United States
Doron Mendels Israel
Jane Chance United States
Philippe Buc United States
Denise Kimber Buell United States
Brian E. Daley United States
Stephen J. Shoemaker relative to Blake Leyerle United States Blake Leyerle's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.5×
Blake Leyerle · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Stephen J. Shoemaker

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen J. Shoemaker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen J. Shoemaker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen J. Shoemaker more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen J. Shoemaker

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen J. Shoemaker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen J. Shoemaker. The network helps show where Stephen J. Shoemaker may publish in the future.

No co-authors to show.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 33 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200338
2 201214
3 201414
4 200113
5 199910
6 20118
7 20167
8 20086
9 20116
10 20055
11
A case of mistaken identity?: naming the gnostic Mary
20024
12 20223
13 20212
14 20202
15 20162
16
The Virgin Mary's Hidden Past: From Ancient Marian Apocrypha to the Medieval Vitae Virginis
20091
17 20061
18
The (re?)discovery of the Kathisma Church and the cult of the virgin in late antique Palestine
20011
19 20161
20 19991

About Stephen J. Shoemaker

Stephen J. Shoemaker is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Archeology, History, Classics and Religious studies, having authored 33 papers that have together received 142 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Historical and Linguistic Studies (15 papers), Archaeology and Historical Studies (12 papers), Historical and Religious Studies of Rome (10 papers), Biblical Studies and Interpretation (9 papers), Islamic Studies and History (8 papers), Byzantine Studies and History (7 papers), Medieval Literature and History (6 papers) and Reformation and Early Modern Christianity (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Classics (50 citations), Archeology (68 citations), Religious studies (29 citations), Anthropology (34 citations) and History (33 citations). Stephen J. Shoemaker has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Theological Studies, Journal of early Christian studies, Church History, Harvard Theological Review and Der Islam.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact