Stephen Hocker

39 papers receiving 372 citations

Peers

Stephen Hocker
Comparison fields: 5 of 34
  • Metals and Alloys 31
  • General Materials Science 17
  • Materials Chemistry 236
  • Mechanical Engineering 109
  • Mechanics of Materials 51
Replace Липницкий Алексей Геннадьевич with:
Липницкий Алексей Геннадьевич Russia
Jan Hartford Sweden
Rodolfo A. Pérez Argentina
M. Arshad Choudhry Pakistan
Jinpeng Chang United States
Lyubomira Veleva Switzerland
Junji Matsunaga Japan
Primo Gondi Italy
P.G. Sanders United States
V. Kuksenko United Kingdom
Stephen Hocker relative to Липницкий Алексей Геннадьевич Russia Липницкий Алексей Геннадьевич's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3.4×
Липницкий Алексей Геннадьевич · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Stephen Hocker

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen Hocker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen Hocker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen Hocker more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen Hocker

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen Hocker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen Hocker. The network helps show where Stephen Hocker may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 20 scholars most cited alongside Stephen Hocker, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Stephen Hocker Line = papers co-authored together Stephen Hocker links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 42 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201629
2 201427
3 200923
4 200921
5 201219
6 201219
7 201919
8 201515
9 201014
10 201114
11 201314
12 202013
13 201111
14 201310
15 20049
16 20129
17 20179
18 20209
19 20188
20 20198

About Stephen Hocker

Stephen Hocker is a scholar working on Materials Chemistry, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Mechanics of Materials, Mechanical Engineering and General Materials Science, having authored 42 papers that have together received 377 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Microstructure and mechanical properties (9 papers), Surface and Thin Film Phenomena (9 papers), Intermetallics and Advanced Alloy Properties (7 papers), Adhesion, Friction, and Surface Interactions (7 papers), Fusion materials and technologies (6 papers), Quasicrystal Structures and Properties (5 papers), Advanced Chemical Physics Studies (4 papers) and Metal and Thin Film Mechanics (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Metals and Alloys (31 citations), General Materials Science (17 citations), Materials Chemistry (236 citations), Mechanical Engineering (109 citations) and Mechanics of Materials (51 citations). Stephen Hocker has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Russia and India. Frequent co-authors include Siegfried Schmauder, Svetlana E. Kulkova, Alexander V. Bakulin, Кульков Сергей Сергеевич, Sergey V. Eremeev, Franz Gähler A, Peter Binkele, Johannes Roth, Hans‐Rainer Trebin and Priyank Vijaya Kumar. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, The Philosophical Magazine A Journal of Theoretical Experimental and Applied Physics, Surface Science, The Journal of Chemical Physics and Journal of Alloys and Compounds.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact