Stephen Hinds

2.7k citations
27 papers · 423 · h-index 9

Impact in

    • Classical Antiquity Studies
    • Historical and Literary Studies
  • Classics top 2%
    • Medieval Literature and History
    • Byzantine Studies and History

Papers in

Stephen Hinds

23 papers receiving 259 citations

Peers

Stephen Hinds
Comparison fields: 5 of 31
  • Anthropology 349
  • Classics 82
  • Archeology 178
  • Philosophy 77
  • Literature and Literary Theory 54
Replace Frederick Ahl with:
Frederick Ahl United States
Raphael Lyne United Kingdom
Thomas Habinek United States
Alison Sharrock United Kingdom
Kathryn Gutzwiller United States
A. J. Woodman United Kingdom
Alessandro Barchiesi Italy
James E. G. Zetzel United States
Emily Gowers United Kingdom
R. G. M. Nisbet United States
Stephen Hinds relative to Frederick Ahl United States Frederick Ahl's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.5×
Frederick Ahl · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Stephen Hinds

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen Hinds's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen Hinds with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen Hinds more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen Hinds

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen Hinds. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen Hinds. The network helps show where Stephen Hinds may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 14 scholars most cited alongside Stephen Hinds, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Stephen Hinds Line = papers co-authored together Stephen Hinds links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 27 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199981
2 198962
3 198546
4 198844
5 198742
6 199936
7
Ovidian transformations : essays on the Metamorphoses and its reception
199929
8 200219
9 200715
10 20117
11 19977
12 20067
13 19876
14
Reflexive annotation in poetic allusion
19953
15 19973
16 20073
17
The poetess and the reader: further steps towards Sulpicia
20163
18 20042
19 19822
20 20052

About Stephen Hinds

Stephen Hinds is a scholar working on Anthropology, Organic Chemistry, Archeology, Classics and History, having authored 27 papers that have together received 423 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Classical Antiquity Studies (18 papers), Organic Chemistry Synthesis Methods (5 papers), Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies (3 papers), Renaissance and Early Modern Studies (2 papers), Byzantine Studies and History (2 papers), Historical and Literary Studies (2 papers), Linguistics and language evolution (2 papers) and Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Anthropology (349 citations), Classics (82 citations), Archeology (178 citations), Philosophy (77 citations) and Literature and Literary Theory (54 citations). Stephen Hinds has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Michèle Lowrie, Betty Rose Nagle, Michael von Albrecht, Philip Hardie, Alessandro Barchiesi, Denis Feeney, James E. G. Zetzel, Theodore Papanghelis, Mitchell Litt and W. Geoffrey Arnott. Their work appears in journals such as Materiali e discussioni per l’analisi dei testi classici, The Journal of Roman Studies, The Classical Quarterly, Phoenix and The Classical World.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact