Stephen Hinds

2.8k citations
30 papers · 456 · h-index 10

Impact in

    • Classical Antiquity Studies
    • Historical and Literary Studies
  • Classics top 2%
    • Medieval Literature and History
    • Byzantine Studies and History

Papers in

Stephen Hinds

26 papers receiving 292 citations

Peers

Stephen Hinds
Comparison fields: 5 of 55
  • Anthropology 349
  • Classics 82
  • Archeology 178
  • Philosophy 77
  • Literature and Literary Theory 54
Replace Dirk Obbink with:
Dirk Obbink United Kingdom
J.M. Bremer Netherlands
Richard H. Rouse United States
J. B. Hofmann United States
Frances M. Young United Kingdom
Paul Harkins United Kingdom
Mark Everist United Kingdom
J. B. Trapp United Kingdom
D. N. MacKenzie Hungary
Denis Stevens United States
Stephen Hinds relative to Dirk Obbink United Kingdom Dirk Obbink's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Dirk Obbink · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Stephen Hinds

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen Hinds's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen Hinds with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen Hinds more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen Hinds

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen Hinds. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen Hinds. The network helps show where Stephen Hinds may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 24 scholars most cited alongside Stephen Hinds, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Stephen Hinds Line = papers co-authored together Stephen Hinds links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 30 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199982
2 198962
3 198545
4 198844
5 198742
6 199936
7
Ovidian transformations : essays on the Metamorphoses and its reception
199930
8 202024
9 200219
10 200715
11 20117
12 20067
13 20197
14 19977
15 19876
16
Reflexive annotation in poetic allusion
19953
17 20073
18 19973
19
The poetess and the reader: further steps towards Sulpicia
20163
20 20042

About Stephen Hinds

Stephen Hinds is a scholar working on Anthropology, Organic Chemistry, Archeology, Classics and History, having authored 30 papers that have together received 456 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Classical Antiquity Studies (18 papers), Organic Chemistry Synthesis Methods (5 papers), Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies (3 papers), Renaissance and Early Modern Studies (2 papers), Byzantine Studies and History (2 papers), Linguistics and language evolution (2 papers), Historical and Literary Studies (2 papers) and Lexicography and Language Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Anthropology (349 citations), Classics (82 citations), Archeology (178 citations), Philosophy (77 citations) and Literature and Literary Theory (54 citations). Stephen Hinds has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Ireland and Norway. Frequent co-authors include Michèle Lowrie, Betty Rose Nagle, Michael von Albrecht, Alessandro Barchiesi, Philip Hardie, Denis Feeney, James E. G. Zetzel, Pádraig Cantillon‐Murphy, Richard Burke and Ole Vegard Solberg. Their work appears in journals such as Materiali e discussioni per l’analisi dei testi classici, The Journal of Roman Studies, The Classical World, Phoenix and The Classical Quarterly.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact