Stephen H. Smith

1.9k citations
32 papers · 976 · h-index 17

Impact in

Papers in

Stephen H. Smith

31 papers receiving 949 citations

Peers

Stephen H. Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 117
  • Nephrology 150
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 237
  • Structural Biology 11
  • Molecular Biology 454
  • Emergency Medical Services 36
Replace Andrew J Williams with:
Andrew J Williams United Kingdom
Jennifer M. Kwan United States
Anik Désormeaux Canada
Hideharu Sekine Japan
M.A. Lazzari Argentina
Lynn Gregory France
Raymond G. Watts United States
Elizabeth H. Field United States
Edgar C. Lucey United States
Lorraine L. Marnell United States
Stephen H. Smith relative to Andrew J Williams United Kingdom Andrew J Williams's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.6×
Andrew J Williams · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Stephen H. Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen H. Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen H. Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen H. Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen H. Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen H. Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen H. Smith. The network helps show where Stephen H. Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Stephen H. Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Stephen H. Smith Line = papers co-authored together Stephen H. Smith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 32 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2001133
2 2008122
3 201782
4 200469
5 200168
6 199257
7 199253
8 199152
9 200848
10 200947
11 201346
12 201723
13 199923
14 201020
15 201819
16 199019
17 201618
18 202316
19 198312
20 19949

About Stephen H. Smith

Stephen H. Smith is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Ecology, Cell Biology and Nature and Landscape Conservation, having authored 32 papers that have together received 976 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cardiomyopathy and Myosin Studies (7 papers), Muscle Physiology and Disorders (3 papers), Peptidase Inhibition and Analysis (3 papers), Signaling Pathways in Disease (3 papers), Cardiac Fibrosis and Remodeling (3 papers), Cardiovascular Effects of Exercise (3 papers), Coral and Marine Ecosystems Studies (3 papers) and Marine animal studies overview (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nephrology (150 citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (237 citations), Structural Biology (11 citations), Molecular Biology (454 citations) and Emergency Medical Services (36 citations). Stephen H. Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Franklin Fuchs, Sanjeev G. Shroff, Mahesh P. Gupta, Sadhana Samant, Adam Irwin, Jane A. Little, Tim Marshall, Hugh C. Rayner, J Smit and Stephen G. Walker. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, Journal of Molecular and Cellular Cardiology, The Journal of Nutritional Biochemistry, Journal of Biological Chemistry and Canadian Journal of Microbiology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact