Stephen Gilbert

20 papers receiving 645 citations

Peers

Stephen Gilbert
Comparison fields: 5 of 78
  • Complementary and alternative medicine 99
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 33
  • Physiology 119
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 37
  • Oncology 116
Replace Kathryn Walker with:
Kathryn Walker United States
Daniela Bassi‐Dibai Brazil
Bruna Eibel Brazil
Haemi Jee South Korea
Sampath Kumar Amaravadi India
Ross Hansen Australia
Robin S.T. Ho Hong Kong
Gwen Fernandes United Kingdom
Morten Zacho Denmark
Ann‐Gret Dahllöf Sweden
Stephen Gilbert relative to Kathryn Walker United States Kathryn Walker's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×11×
Kathryn Walker · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Stephen Gilbert

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen Gilbert's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen Gilbert with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen Gilbert more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen Gilbert

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen Gilbert. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen Gilbert. The network helps show where Stephen Gilbert may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Stephen Gilbert, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Stephen Gilbert Line = papers co-authored together Stephen Gilbert links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 24 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2018182
2 2013157
3 201459
4 201845
5 202345
6 201643
7 202222
8 201319
9 202218
10 197912
11 20219
12 20219
13 20219
14 20178
15 20234
16
Nontreatment variables affecting return-to-work in Tennessee-based employees with complaints of low back pain.
20004
17 20243
18 20252
19 20242
20 19691

About Stephen Gilbert

Stephen Gilbert is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Pharmacology, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine and Oncology, having authored 24 papers that have together received 653 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cardiovascular and exercise physiology (2 papers), Opioid Use Disorder Treatment (2 papers), Pain Management and Treatment (2 papers), Cancer survivorship and care (2 papers), Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (2 papers), Sport Psychology and Performance (1 paper), Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation (1 paper) and Cardiovascular Health and Disease Prevention (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Complementary and alternative medicine (99 citations), Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (33 citations), Physiology (119 citations), Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (37 citations) and Oncology (116 citations). Stephen Gilbert has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Garry A. Tew, John Saxton, Liam Bourke, Liane Lewis, Jonathan Aning, Ruth Ashton, Derek J. Rosario, Miland Joshi, John Saxton and Richard Hooper. Their work appears in journals such as British Journal of Sports Medicine, The Medical Journal of Australia, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, European Urology and The Spine Journal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact