Stephen Gallagher

158 papers receiving 4.0k citations

Peers

Stephen Gallagher
Comparison fields: 5 of 148
  • Clinical Psychology 1.6k
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 237
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 87
  • Health 428
  • Applied Psychology 200
Replace Benjamin P. Chapman with:
Benjamin P. Chapman United States
Edwin de Beurs Netherlands
Ruth Parslow Australia
Marcelo Pio de Almeida Fleck Brazil
Laura Pulkki-Råbäck Finland
Lynanne McGuire United States
Elmar Bräehler Germany
Tamara L. Newton United States
Maria Melchior France
Richard J. Contrada United States
Stephen Gallagher relative to Benjamin P. Chapman United States Benjamin P. Chapman's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.4×
Benjamin P. Chapman · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Stephen Gallagher

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen Gallagher's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen Gallagher with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen Gallagher more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen Gallagher

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen Gallagher. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen Gallagher. The network helps show where Stephen Gallagher may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Stephen Gallagher, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Stephen Gallagher Line = papers co-authored together Stephen Gallagher links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 168 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2017157
2 2019156
3 2008149
4 2013118
5 2010106
6 2009103
7 201598
8 202091
9 201490
10 200684
11 200883
12 202080
13 201579
14 201374
15 200872
16 201069
17 201467
18 201265
19 202065
20 201262

About Stephen Gallagher

Stephen Gallagher is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Health, Social Psychology, General Health Professions and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 168 papers that have together received 4.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Family and Disability Support Research (25 papers), Health disparities and outcomes (19 papers), Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction (18 papers), Stress Responses and Cortisol (15 papers), Cardiac Health and Mental Health (12 papers), Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (11 papers), Infant Development and Preterm Care (9 papers) and Health, psychology, and well-being (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (1.6k citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (237 citations), Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (87 citations), Health (428 citations) and Applied Psychology (200 citations). Stephen Gallagher has collaborated with scholars based in Ireland, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Anna C. Phillips, Douglas Carroll, Ann‐Marie Creaven, Orla T. Muldoon, Deirdre O’Shea, Brenda H. O’Connell, Mickey Keenan, Ailish Hannigan, Siobhán Howard and Mark T. Drayson. Their work appears in journals such as Psychophysiology, International Journal of Psychophysiology, Research in Developmental Disabilities, Brain Behavior and Immunity and Physiology & Behavior.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact