Stephen Ford
Impact in
-
- Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
- Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
- Cardiovascular Health and Disease Prevention
- Cardiac Health and Mental Health
Papers in
-
- Archaeology and Rock Art Studies 2
-
- Archaeology and ancient environmental studies 2
- Co-authors
- Richard A. Bradley (2 shared papers)PETER F. FISHER (1 shared paper)John Hawkes (1 shared paper)Michael P. Atkinson (1 shared paper)Philip Chu (1 shared paper)Gale L. Paulsen (1 shared paper)Peter Jacko (1 shared paper)K. D. Glazebrook (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Oxford Journal of Archaeology (2 papers)The Lancet (1 paper)European Journal of Operational Research (1 paper)Medical Entomology and Zoology (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesSri Lanka
In The Last Decade
Stephen Ford
6 papers receiving 327 citations
Stephen Ford's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 66
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 195
- Family Practice 13
- Library and Information Sciences 6
- Archeology 4
- Obstetrics and Gynecology 15
Countries citing papers authored by Stephen Ford
This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen Ford's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen Ford with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen Ford more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen Ford
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen Ford. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen Ford. The network helps show where Stephen Ford may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 9 scholars most cited alongside Stephen Ford, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Efficacy of self-monitored blood pressure, with or without telemonitoring, for titration of antihypertensive medication (TASMINH4): an unmasked randomised controlled trial Hit paper breakdown → | 2018 | 318 |
| 2 | 1984 | 18 | |
| 3 | The Acquisition of Library Materials | 1978 | 13 |
| 4 | 1986 | 7 | |
| 5 | 2015 | 3 | |
| 6 | 2019 | 2 |
About Stephen Ford
Stephen Ford is a scholar working on Archeology, Paleontology, Anthropology, Automotive Engineering and Management Science and Operations Research, having authored 6 papers that have together received 361 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Archaeology and Rock Art Studies (2 papers), Archaeology and ancient environmental studies (2 papers), Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology (2 papers), Advanced Bandit Algorithms Research (1 paper), Planetary Science and Exploration (1 paper), Transportation and Mobility Innovations (1 paper), Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies (1 paper) and Age of Information Optimization (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (195 citations), Family Practice (13 citations), Library and Information Sciences (6 citations), Archeology (4 citations) and Obstetrics and Gynecology (15 citations). Stephen Ford has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Sri Lanka. Frequent co-authors include Richard A. Bradley, PETER F. FISHER, John Hawkes, Michael P. Atkinson, Philip Chu, Gale L. Paulsen, Peter Jacko, K. D. Glazebrook and Kris A. Zacny. Their work appears in journals such as Oxford Journal of Archaeology, The Lancet, European Journal of Operational Research and Medical Entomology and Zoology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.