Stephen E. Wong

42 papers receiving 670 citations

Peers

Stephen E. Wong
Comparison fields: 5 of 81
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 237
  • Public Administration 61
  • Clinical Psychology 332
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 215
  • Philosophy 113
Replace Henry C. Rickard with:
Henry C. Rickard United States
Robin L. Cautin United States
Bengt‐Åke Armelius Sweden
Nancy J. Rubin United States
William J. Di Scipio United States
Shelagh M. Brumfitt United Kingdom
António José Marques Portugal
Anindya Ghosh India
Philippa H. Campbell United States
Anne McIntyre United Kingdom
Stephen E. Wong relative to Henry C. Rickard United States Henry C. Rickard's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×10×15×18×
Henry C. Rickard · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Stephen E. Wong

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen E. Wong's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen E. Wong with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen E. Wong more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen E. Wong

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen E. Wong. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen E. Wong. The network helps show where Stephen E. Wong may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Stephen E. Wong, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Stephen E. Wong Line = papers co-authored together Stephen E. Wong links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 45 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 198586
2 200977
3 198252
4 201148
5 201741
6 198736
7
Evaluation of staff training in group homes for retarded persons.
197729
8 199327
9 198826
10 198924
11 200621
12 200921
13 200820
14 197919
15 197818
16 198818
17 198116
18 201015
19 201514
20 199313

About Stephen E. Wong

Stephen E. Wong is a scholar working on Developmental and Educational Psychology, Psychiatry and Mental health, Clinical Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience and General Health Professions, having authored 45 papers that have together received 755 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Behavioral and Psychological Studies (23 papers), Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (14 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (10 papers), Schizophrenia research and treatment (7 papers), Mental Health and Psychiatry (5 papers), Mental Health Treatment and Access (4 papers), Mental Health and Patient Involvement (4 papers) and Social Work Education and Practice (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental and Educational Psychology (237 citations), Public Administration (61 citations), Clinical Psychology (332 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (215 citations) and Philosophy (113 citations). Stephen E. Wong has collaborated with scholars based in United States, New Zealand and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Robert Paul Liberman, Steven P. Schinke, H. Keith Massel, Paul K. Leung, Mark J. Macgowan, Thomas E. Smith, Lewayne D. Gilchrist, Tomi Gomory, David Cohen and Jeffrey R. Lacasse. Their work appears in journals such as Research on Social Work Practice, Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, Journal of Social Service Research, Behavior Modification and Psychiatric Services.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact