Stephen E. Tenn

1.4k citations
56 papers · 1.1k · h-index 18

Impact in

Papers in

Stephen E. Tenn

54 papers receiving 1.0k citations

Peers

Stephen E. Tenn
Comparison fields: 5 of 104
  • Radiation 343
  • Human-Computer Interaction 80
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 184
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 245
  • Genetics 83
Replace André Minken with:
André Minken Netherlands
Lucia J. Zamorano United States
Timothy T. Bui United States
Matteo Mario Bonsanto Germany
Sonja Adebahr Germany
Young‐Taek Oh South Korea
Valeria Meier Switzerland
Marcus D. Seemann Germany
Evelyn Herrmann Switzerland
Barbara Carl Germany
Stephen E. Tenn relative to André Minken Netherlands André Minken's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4.2×
André Minken · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Stephen E. Tenn

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen E. Tenn's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen E. Tenn with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen E. Tenn more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen E. Tenn

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen E. Tenn. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen E. Tenn. The network helps show where Stephen E. Tenn may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Stephen E. Tenn, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Stephen E. Tenn Line = papers co-authored together Stephen E. Tenn links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 56 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2016246
2 2008178
3 201568
4 201466
5 201531
6 201925
7 201724
8 201823
9 201720
10 201720
11 202119
12 202119
13 201419
14 201819
15 202319
16 201518
17 201618
18 201718
19 201617
20 200516

About Stephen E. Tenn

Stephen E. Tenn is a scholar working on Radiation, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Neurology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and Genetics, having authored 56 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques (23 papers), Meningioma and schwannoma management (8 papers), Brain Metastases and Treatment (8 papers), Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment (7 papers), Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications (6 papers), Head and Neck Cancer Studies (5 papers), Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment (5 papers) and Radiation Therapy and Dosimetry (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Radiation (343 citations), Human-Computer Interaction (80 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (184 citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (245 citations) and Genetics (83 citations). Stephen E. Tenn has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and Portugal. Frequent co-authors include Isaac Yang, Timothy D. Solberg, Paul M. Medin, F.-F. Yin, Jian‐Yue Jin, Nolan M. Ung, Daniel T. Nagasawa, Tania Betty Kaprealian, Panayiotis E. Pelargos and Percy Lee. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, Medical Physics, World Neurosurgery, Practical Radiation Oncology and Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact