STEPHEN E. HOWE

27 papers receiving 599 citations

Peers

STEPHEN E. HOWE
Comparison fields: 5 of 60
  • Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 45
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 244
  • Reproductive Medicine 52
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 17
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 57
Replace Mohamad A. Sidani with:
Mohamad A. Sidani United States
Adrian Coles United States
Andrew M. Schulman United States
Odile Stalder Switzerland
Bastiaan van Dam Netherlands
Michael Celinski United Kingdom
Álvaro Sepúlveda-Martínez Chile
Hsi Chu Taiwan
Cornelis J. Biesheuvel Australia
Federico Nardi Italy
STEPHEN E. HOWE relative to Mohamad A. Sidani United States Mohamad A. Sidani's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×11.4×
Mohamad A. Sidani · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by STEPHEN E. HOWE

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of STEPHEN E. HOWE's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by STEPHEN E. HOWE with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites STEPHEN E. HOWE more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by STEPHEN E. HOWE

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by STEPHEN E. HOWE. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by STEPHEN E. HOWE. The network helps show where STEPHEN E. HOWE may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 23 scholars most cited alongside STEPHEN E. HOWE, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with STEPHEN E. HOWE Line = papers co-authored together STEPHEN E. HOWE links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 27 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199482
2 201968
3 202261
4 202253
5 201652
6 201448
7 198627
8 202126
9 202325
10 202424
11
Platelet antibody binding in systemic lupus erythematosus.
198721
12 199519
13 202118
14 198617
15 199114
16 202214
17 198712
18 202212
19 19878
20 19857

About STEPHEN E. HOWE

STEPHEN E. HOWE is a scholar working on Reproductive Medicine, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Hematology, Infectious Diseases and Pathology and Forensic Medicine, having authored 27 papers that have together received 626 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes (7 papers), Sperm and Testicular Function (5 papers), COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies (3 papers), Platelet Disorders and Treatments (2 papers), Electronic Health Records Systems (1 paper), Systemic Sclerosis and Related Diseases (1 paper), Life Cycle Costing Analysis (1 paper) and Accounting Theory and Financial Reporting (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (45 citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (244 citations), Reproductive Medicine (52 citations), Geriatrics and Gerontology (17 citations) and Pathology and Forensic Medicine (57 citations). STEPHEN E. HOWE has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Serbia and Denmark. Frequent co-authors include Carol Peebles, Judith E. Sallustio, Ralph C. Williams, Ervin Y. Eaker, Eng M. Tan, Philip S. Mehler, R. Scott Evans, James F. Lloyd, Whitney R. Buckel and Xiaoming Sheng. Their work appears in journals such as EP Europace, American Journal of Reproductive Immunology, Fertility and Sterility, Thrombosis and Haemostasis and Journal of Clinical Investigation.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact