Stephen E. Folger

747 citations
11 papers · 582 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Stephen E. Folger

10 papers receiving 566 citations

Peers

Stephen E. Folger
Comparison fields: 5 of 75
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 401
  • Complementary and Manual Therapy 25
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 92
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 57
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 54
Replace Arihiro Hatta with:
Arihiro Hatta Japan
Claude Ervin Davis United States
Afra M. Wohlschlaeger Germany
Takeshi Kaneda Japan
Amy L. Parkinson United Kingdom
Frank Marzinzik Germany
Marie-Noële Magnié-Mauro France
Marc Joliot France
Nicolas Langbour France
Vinay Tannan United States
Stephen E. Folger relative to Arihiro Hatta Japan Arihiro Hatta's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4×5×
Arihiro Hatta · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Stephen E. Folger

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen E. Folger's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen E. Folger with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen E. Folger more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen E. Folger

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen E. Folger. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen E. Folger. The network helps show where Stephen E. Folger may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Stephen E. Folger, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Stephen E. Folger Line = papers co-authored together Stephen E. Folger links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

11 of 11 papers shown
#Work
1 2007301
2
Changes in EEG during graded exercise on a recumbent cycle ergometer.
200899
3 201037
4 199733
5 199925
6 200825
7 201421
8 200817
9 201912
10 199610
11 20142

About Stephen E. Folger

Stephen E. Folger is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Complementary and Manual Therapy, Complementary and alternative medicine and Neurology, having authored 11 papers that have together received 582 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Tactile and Sensory Interactions (4 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (3 papers), Multisensory perception and integration (3 papers), EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces (2 papers), Cardiovascular and exercise physiology (1 paper), Neuroscience and Neural Engineering (1 paper), Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (1 paper) and Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (401 citations), Complementary and Manual Therapy (25 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (92 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (57 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (54 citations). Stephen E. Folger has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Sweden. Frequent co-authors include Gregory Essick, Francis P McGlone, Vinay Tannan, Kevin Archer Pelphrey, Carissa J. Cascio, Grace T. Baranek, Eric E. Hall, Paul C. Miller, Edward F. Kelly and Mark Tommerdahl. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance, BMC Neuroscience, Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, Neurology Report and Journal of Pain.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact