Stephen Diacon

1.1k citations
30 papers · 787 · h-index 15

Impact in

Papers in

Stephen Diacon

29 papers receiving 685 citations

Peers

Stephen Diacon
Comparison fields: 5 of 60
  • General Decision Sciences 73
  • Accounting 322
  • Finance 222
  • Economics and Econometrics 487
  • Demography 141
Replace Costanza Torricelli with:
Costanza Torricelli Italy
Hideshi Itoh Japan
Gary G. Schlarbaum United States
Jeremy K. Page United States
Milo Bianchi France
Alejandro Drexler United States
Paolo Sodini Sweden
Gene Amromin United States
George M. Korniotis United States
Oliver G. Spalt Germany
Stephen Diacon relative to Costanza Torricelli Italy Costanza Torricelli's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.6×
Costanza Torricelli · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Stephen Diacon

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen Diacon's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen Diacon with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen Diacon more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen Diacon

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen Diacon. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen Diacon. The network helps show where Stephen Diacon may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 12 scholars most cited alongside Stephen Diacon, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Stephen Diacon Line = papers co-authored together Stephen Diacon links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 30 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2007172
2 2002125
3 200671
4 200454
5 200154
6 200344
7 199542
8 199630
9 200228
10 199625
11 199821
12 199918
13
How long do people expect to live? Results and implications
200517
14 199616
15 201315
16 199412
17 19967
18 19906
19
Success in Insurance
19846
20
The British insurance industry : a statistical review
19835

About Stephen Diacon

Stephen Diacon is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, Accounting, Finance, Demography and General Decision Sciences, having authored 30 papers that have together received 787 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Insurance and Financial Risk Management (22 papers), Risk Management in Financial Firms (8 papers), Insurance, Mortality, Demography, Risk Management (4 papers), Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance (4 papers), Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (3 papers), Agricultural risk and resilience (2 papers), Banking stability, regulation, efficiency (2 papers) and Global Health Care Issues (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Decision Sciences (73 citations), Accounting (322 citations), Finance (222 citations), Economics and Econometrics (487 citations) and Demography (141 citations). Stephen Diacon has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Noel O’Sullivan, Christine Ennew, Paul Fenn, Claire O’Brien, Dev Vencappa, John Hasseldine, Paul J. M. Klumpes, Chris O’Brien, Simon Ashby and Chris O’Brien. Their work appears in journals such as The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance Issues and Practice, International Journal of the Economics of Business, European Journal of Marketing, Economics Letters and International Journal of Auditing.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact