Stephen De Wilde
Impact in
- Geriatrics and Gerontology top 2%
- Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
-
- Aging and Gerontology Research
Papers in
-
- Glaucoma and retinal disorders 4
- Retinal Diseases and Treatments 1
-
- Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes 2
- Co-authors
- Derek G. Cook (9 shared papers)Iain M. Carey (8 shared papers)Tess Harris (3 shared papers)Christina Victor (3 shared papers)Sean Hilton (5 shared papers)Nicky Richards (4 shared papers)Sunil Shah (2 shared papers)Elizabeth Rink (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- British Journal of Ophthalmology (1 paper)Ageing and Society (1 paper)Drugs & Aging (1 paper)International Journal of Medical Informatics (1 paper)BMC Family Practice (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomAustraliaGermany
In The Last Decade
Stephen De Wilde
10 papers receiving 466 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 72
- Geriatrics and Gerontology 130
- Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 35
- Health 94
- Ophthalmology 80
- Family Practice 13
Countries citing papers authored by Stephen De Wilde
This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen De Wilde's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen De Wilde with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen De Wilde more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen De Wilde
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen De Wilde. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen De Wilde. The network helps show where Stephen De Wilde may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 15 scholars most cited alongside Stephen De Wilde, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2002 | 133 | |
| 2 | 2008 | 92 | |
| 3 | 2006 | 74 | |
| 4 | 2004 | 48 | |
| 5 | 2010 | 37 | |
| 6 | 2006 | 35 | |
| 7 | 2003 | 33 | |
| 8 | A comparison of the recording of 30 common childhood conditions in the Doctor's Independent Network and General Practice Research Databases. | 2004 | 26 |
| 9 | 2008 | 17 | |
| 10 | 1958 | 10 |
About Stephen De Wilde
Stephen De Wilde is a scholar working on Ophthalmology, Geriatrics and Gerontology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology and Health, having authored 10 papers that have together received 505 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Glaucoma and retinal disorders (4 papers), Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes (2 papers), Health disparities and outcomes (1 paper), Child and Adolescent Health (1 paper), Retinal Diseases and Treatments (1 paper), Corneal surgery and disorders (1 paper), Retinal Imaging and Analysis (1 paper) and Aging and Gerontology Research (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Geriatrics and Gerontology (130 citations), Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (35 citations), Health (94 citations), Ophthalmology (80 citations) and Family Practice (13 citations). Stephen De Wilde has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Derek G. Cook, Iain M. Carey, Tess Harris, Christina Victor, Sean Hilton, Nicky Richards, Sunil Shah, Elizabeth Rink, Sasha Scambler and Christopher G. Owen. Their work appears in journals such as British Journal of Ophthalmology, Ageing and Society, Drugs & Aging, International Journal of Medical Informatics and BMC Family Practice.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.