Stephen D. Warren

15 papers receiving 242 citations

Peers

Stephen D. Warren
Comparison fields: 5 of 53
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 85
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 78
  • Pharmaceutical Science 16
  • Physical and Theoretical Chemistry 17
  • Molecular Biology 114
Replace Nicolas K. Shinada with:
Nicolas K. Shinada France
Deborah A. Loughney United States
Julie E. Cansfield United Kingdom
Alessandro Padova Italy
Duncan C. Miller United Kingdom
Phani Ghanakota United States
Majda Misini Ignjatović Sweden
Shuichi Furuya Japan
Karin E. Bauer United States
Matthew Richards United States
Stephen D. Warren relative to Nicolas K. Shinada France Nicolas K. Shinada's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×14×
Nicolas K. Shinada · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Stephen D. Warren

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen D. Warren's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen D. Warren with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen D. Warren more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen D. Warren

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen D. Warren. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen D. Warren. The network helps show where Stephen D. Warren may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Stephen D. Warren, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Stephen D. Warren Line = papers co-authored together Stephen D. Warren links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

15 of 15 papers shown
#Work
1 2012120
2
Improving the tumor retention of radioiodinated antibody: aryl carbohydrate adducts.
199049
3 199521
4 198818
5 200516
6 20209
7 20197
8 20202
9 20212
10 20122
11 20202
12 19901
13 20191
14 20091
15 19891

About Stephen D. Warren

Stephen D. Warren is a scholar working on Organic Chemistry, Inorganic Chemistry, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Molecular Biology and Oncology, having authored 15 papers that have together received 252 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Crystal structures of chemical compounds (6 papers), Radiopharmaceutical Chemistry and Applications (4 papers), Synthesis and biological activity (4 papers), Cancer, Hypoxia, and Metabolism (3 papers), Fluorine in Organic Chemistry (2 papers), Crystallography and molecular interactions (2 papers), Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research (2 papers) and Chemical Synthesis and Analysis (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Computational Theory and Mathematics (85 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (78 citations), Pharmaceutical Science (16 citations), Physical and Theoretical Chemistry (17 citations) and Molecular Biology (114 citations). Stephen D. Warren has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Brian Kelley, Anthony Nicholls, D. Thanh, Gregory L. Warren, Janet F. Eary, K. Richter, C Badger, Oliver W. Press, W. B. Nelp and K. A. Krohn. Their work appears in journals such as Acta Crystallographica Section B Structural Science Crystal Engineering and Materials, Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, Crystal Growth & Design, Drug Discovery Today and Xenobiotica.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact