Stephen D. Nash

25 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

Stephen D. Nash
Comparison fields: 5 of 113
  • Developmental Biology 89
  • Social Psychology 420
  • Paleontology 121
  • Ecological Modeling 54
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 171
Replace Sanae Kasahara with:
Sanae Kasahara Brazil
P Hecketsweiler France
J. Hanks United States
Brendan N. Reid United States
Abhijit Das India
D. I. Chapman United Kingdom
M. J. K. Harper United States
Tomoko Uchida Japan
I. W. Rowlands United Kingdom
J. Eduardo P. W. Bicudo Brazil
Stephen D. Nash relative to Sanae Kasahara Brazil Sanae Kasahara's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×12.3×
Sanae Kasahara · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Stephen D. Nash

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen D. Nash's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen D. Nash with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen D. Nash more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen D. Nash

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen D. Nash. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen D. Nash. The network helps show where Stephen D. Nash may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Stephen D. Nash, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Stephen D. Nash Line = papers co-authored together Stephen D. Nash links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 26 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2002182
2 2013141
3
Lemurs of Madagascar : a strategy for their conservation 2013-2016
2013123
4 2011105
5
An Updated taxonomy and Conservation Status Review of Asian Primates
2014104
6 201571
7 200858
8
Primates of Colombia
200451
9
Primates of West Africa : a field guide and natural history
201145
10 201837
11 202129
12 201727
13 200825
14 200524
15 197723
16 201722
17 201918
18 200518
19 201614
20 201511

About Stephen D. Nash

Stephen D. Nash is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Global and Planetary Change, Paleontology, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics and Ecology, having authored 26 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Primate Behavior and Ecology (16 papers), Amphibian and Reptile Biology (11 papers), Evolution and Paleontology Studies (5 papers), Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (3 papers), Animal Behavior and Reproduction (3 papers), Nutritional Studies and Diet (2 papers), Nuts composition and effects (2 papers) and Species Distribution and Climate Change (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental Biology (89 citations), Social Psychology (420 citations), Paleontology (121 citations), Ecological Modeling (54 citations) and Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (171 citations). Stephen D. Nash has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Brazil and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Russell A. Mittermeier, David T. Nash, John R. Guyton, Moti L. Kashyap, Anthony B. Rylands, John F. Oates, Christian Roos, Colin P. Groves, Peter Paul van Dijk and Anders G. J. Rhodin. Their work appears in journals such as PeerJ, Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, Primates, The American Journal of Cardiology and Journal of Heredity.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact