Stephen D. Lorimer

836 citations
28 papers · 639 · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

Stephen D. Lorimer

27 papers receiving 599 citations

Peers

Stephen D. Lorimer
Comparison fields: 5 of 83
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 321
  • Plant Science 309
  • Pharmacology 44
  • Pharmacology 85
  • Complementary and alternative medicine 40
Replace Raimundo Cabrera with:
Raimundo Cabrera Spain
E. Rodríguez United States
Anna K. Picman Canada
Nattawut Rungjindamai Thailand
George Sturtz United States
María F. Agra Brazil
Shûhei Nakajima Japan
Palle Friis United Kingdom
Lorenzo Sparapano Italy
Alberto A. Gurni Argentina
Stephen D. Lorimer relative to Raimundo Cabrera Spain Raimundo Cabrera's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.0×
Raimundo Cabrera · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Stephen D. Lorimer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen D. Lorimer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen D. Lorimer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen D. Lorimer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen D. Lorimer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen D. Lorimer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen D. Lorimer. The network helps show where Stephen D. Lorimer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Stephen D. Lorimer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Stephen D. Lorimer Line = papers co-authored together Stephen D. Lorimer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 28 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1999101
2 199657
3 201955
4 200254
5 199944
6 199340
7 199637
8 198735
9 199628
10 200221
11 200118
12 199716
13 200515
14 199515
15 199612
16 199612
17 199711
18 200511
19 200310
20 200310

About Stephen D. Lorimer

Stephen D. Lorimer is a scholar working on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Plant Science, Molecular Biology, Insect Science and Cancer Research, having authored 28 papers that have together received 639 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Bryophyte Studies and Records (14 papers), Botany and Plant Ecology Studies (12 papers), Lichen and fungal ecology (7 papers), Sesquiterpenes and Asteraceae Studies (3 papers), Traditional and Medicinal Uses of Annonaceae (2 papers), Plant Toxicity and Pharmacological Properties (2 papers), Natural product bioactivities and synthesis (2 papers) and Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (321 citations), Plant Science (309 citations), Pharmacology (44 citations), Pharmacology (85 citations) and Complementary and alternative medicine (40 citations). Stephen D. Lorimer has collaborated with scholars based in New Zealand, Canada and South Korea. Frequent co-authors include Nigel B. Perry, Elaine J. Burgess, Rex T. Weavers, Raymond S. Tangney, Lysa M. Foster, M. H. Benn, Nerida J. Brennan, D. J. Galloway, Gill Ellis and Jochen M. Scher. Their work appears in journals such as Phytochemistry, Journal of Natural Products, Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, The Lichenologist and Tetrahedron.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact