Stephen Cope

36 papers receiving 612 citations

Peers

Stephen Cope
Comparison fields: 5 of 87
  • Public Administration 81
  • Music 61
  • Clinical Psychology 277
  • Rehabilitation 40
  • Social Psychology 121
Replace Bob Sapey with:
Bob Sapey United Kingdom
Shane Butler Ireland
Todd McCallum United States
Peter A. S. Winn United States
Òscar Chiva-Bartoll Spain
Kahryn Hughes United Kingdom
Helen A. Schartz United States
Mark Lefton United States
Andrew Sparkes United Kingdom
Richard McGrath Australia
Stephen Cope relative to Bob Sapey United Kingdom Bob Sapey's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×20×30.5×
Bob Sapey · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Stephen Cope

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen Cope's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen Cope with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen Cope more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen Cope

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen Cope. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen Cope. The network helps show where Stephen Cope may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 20 scholars most cited alongside Stephen Cope, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Stephen Cope Line = papers co-authored together Stephen Cope links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 37 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2011198
2 2009109
3 199767
4 201657
5
Effects of a yoga lifestyle intervention on performance-related characteristics of musicians: a preliminary study.
200642
6
Yoga reduces performance anxiety in adolescent musicians.
201341
7 199522
8 199918
9 199714
10 200414
11
The policy-making context: who shapes policing policy?
200012
12 199710
13 199610
14
Policing and the power of persuasion
20009
15 19959
16 20008
17 19978
18 19995
19 19944
20 20034

About Stephen Cope

Stephen Cope is a scholar working on Public Administration, Political Science and International Relations, Finance, Rehabilitation and Law, having authored 37 papers that have together received 691 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Policing Practices and Perceptions (7 papers), Public Policy and Administration Research (6 papers), European Criminal Justice and Data Protection (4 papers), Healthcare innovation and challenges (3 papers), Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions (3 papers), Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism (3 papers), Regulation and Compliance Studies (3 papers) and Musicians’ Health and Performance (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Public Administration (81 citations), Music (61 citations), Clinical Psychology (277 citations), Rehabilitation (40 citations) and Social Psychology (121 citations). Stephen Cope has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and India. Frequent co-authors include Sat Bir S. Khalsa, Deborah A. Cohen, Naomi J. Steiner, Stephanie M. Shorter, Grace Wyshak, Rob E. Atkinson, Sarah Charman, Stephen P. Savage, Bethany Butzer and Tosca D. Braun. Their work appears in journals such as Public Policy and Administration, Public Money & Management, International Journal of Public Sector Management, Journal of Vocational Education and Training and Social Policy and Administration.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact