Stephen Cope

27 papers receiving 528 citations

Peers

Stephen Cope
Comparison fields: 5 of 84
  • Music 61
  • Public Administration 64
  • Clinical Psychology 284
  • Applied Psychology 38
  • Social Psychology 134
Replace Howard L. Nixon with:
Howard L. Nixon United States
Bob Sapey United Kingdom
Susan Clarke United Kingdom
Jeffrey R. Bedell United States
Sabine Andresen Germany
Evangelos Bebetsos Greece
Timothy Baghurst United States
Patricia Vertinsky Canada
Andrew Sparkes United Kingdom
Samta P. Pandya India
Stephen Cope relative to Howard L. Nixon United States Howard L. Nixon's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.4×
Howard L. Nixon · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Stephen Cope

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen Cope's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen Cope with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen Cope more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen Cope

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen Cope. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen Cope. The network helps show where Stephen Cope may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 20 scholars most cited alongside Stephen Cope, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Stephen Cope Line = papers co-authored together Stephen Cope links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 28 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2011175
2 2009108
3 199764
4 201650
5
Effects of a yoga lifestyle intervention on performance-related characteristics of musicians: a preliminary study.
200642
6
Yoga reduces performance anxiety in adolescent musicians.
201336
7 199518
8 199916
9 200412
10
The policy-making context: who shapes policing policy?
200012
11 199510
12 20009
13 19978
14 19967
15 20006
16 19994
17 20033
18 19962
19 19902
20 20011

About Stephen Cope

Stephen Cope is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Public Administration, Social Psychology, Finance and Rehabilitation, having authored 28 papers that have together received 593 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Policing Practices and Perceptions (7 papers), Public Policy and Administration Research (4 papers), European Criminal Justice and Data Protection (4 papers), Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions (3 papers), Musicians’ Health and Performance (3 papers), Healthcare innovation and challenges (3 papers), Diverse Music Education Insights (3 papers) and Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Music (61 citations), Public Administration (64 citations), Clinical Psychology (284 citations), Applied Psychology (38 citations) and Social Psychology (134 citations). Stephen Cope has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and India. Frequent co-authors include Sat Bir S. Khalsa, Deborah Cohen, Naomi J. Steiner, Stephanie Shorter, Grace Wyshak, Sarah Charman, Stephen P. Savage, Bethany Butzer, John W. Harrington and Michael H. Antoni. Their work appears in journals such as Public Policy and Administration, International Journal of Public Sector Management, The American Historical Review, The Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research and Public Administration.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact