Stephen C. Smith

167 papers receiving 4.3k citations

Peers

Stephen C. Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 189
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 744
  • Public Administration 217
  • Accounting 409
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 456
  • Economics and Econometrics 711
Replace Charles Brown with:
Charles Brown United States
Joan Robinson Canada
James K. Hammitt United States
David Goldblatt United Kingdom
Hongbin Li China
Jeroen Smits Netherlands
Michael R. Reich United States
Mónica Das Gupta United States
David Harvey United Kingdom
Gary J. Miller United States
Stephen C. Smith relative to Charles Brown United States Charles Brown's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.8×
Charles Brown · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Stephen C. Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen C. Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen C. Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen C. Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen C. Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen C. Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen C. Smith. The network helps show where Stephen C. Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Stephen C. Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Stephen C. Smith Line = papers co-authored together Stephen C. Smith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 182 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1997339
2 1997324
3 2011245
4 2001244
5 2018197
6 1997173
7
Economic Development, 8th edition
2003172
8 2018138
9 1997110
10 2018105
11 1992100
12 198487
13 201185
14 199184
15 200275
16 200969
17 201658
18 200556
19 201255
20 200754

About Stephen C. Smith

Stephen C. Smith is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Accounting and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 182 papers that have together received 4.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Semiconductor Quantum Structures and Devices (17 papers), Semiconductor Lasers and Optical Devices (15 papers), Photonic and Optical Devices (15 papers), Corporate Finance and Governance (15 papers), Poverty, Education, and Child Welfare (13 papers), Income, Poverty, and Inequality (9 papers), Agricultural risk and resilience (8 papers) and Labor Movements and Unions (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Obstetrics and Gynecology (744 citations), Public Administration (217 citations), Accounting (409 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (456 citations) and Economics and Econometrics (711 citations). Stephen C. Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Philip N. Baker, E. M. Symonds, Michael P. Todaro, Uwe Jirjahn, Ka‐Fai To, Munshi Sulaiman, Daljit Singh Sahota, Jan Švejnar, Yao Pan and Milan Vodopivec. Their work appears in journals such as Applied Physics Letters, Crop Science, Journal of Comparative Economics, Malaria Journal and Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact