Stephen C. Smith

179 papers receiving 4.6k citations

Peers

Stephen C. Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 191
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 782
  • Public Administration 251
  • Accounting 448
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 493
  • Strategy and Management 459
Replace Charles Brown with:
Charles Brown United States
Joan Robinson Canada
James K. Hammitt United States
Hongbin Li China
Michael R. Reich United States
David Harvey United Kingdom
Jeroen Smits Netherlands
D. O’Brien Australia
Mónica Das Gupta United States
Gary J. Miller United States
Stephen C. Smith relative to Charles Brown United States Charles Brown's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×3.6×
Charles Brown · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Stephen C. Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen C. Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen C. Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen C. Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen C. Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen C. Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen C. Smith. The network helps show where Stephen C. Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Stephen C. Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Stephen C. Smith Line = papers co-authored together Stephen C. Smith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 194 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1997357
2 1997344
3 2001252
4 2011248
5 2018203
6 1997184
7
Economic Development, 8th edition
2003176
8 2018139
9 2018124
10 1997115
11 1992114
12 1991101
13 201191
14 198491
15 200277
16 200975
17 200561
18 201658
19 200256
20 201255

About Stephen C. Smith

Stephen C. Smith is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Sociology and Political Science, Accounting and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, having authored 194 papers that have together received 5.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Semiconductor Quantum Structures and Devices (17 papers), Corporate Finance and Governance (16 papers), Semiconductor Lasers and Optical Devices (15 papers), Photonic and Optical Devices (15 papers), Poverty, Education, and Child Welfare (14 papers), Income, Poverty, and Inequality (11 papers), Cooperative Studies and Economics (9 papers) and Labor Movements and Unions (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Obstetrics and Gynecology (782 citations), Public Administration (251 citations), Accounting (448 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (493 citations) and Strategy and Management (459 citations). Stephen C. Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Philip N. Baker, E. M. Symonds, Michael P. Todaro, Uwe Jirjahn, Ka‐Fai To, Munshi Sulaiman, Daljit Singh Sahota, Jan Švejnar, Yao Pan and Milan Vodopivec. Their work appears in journals such as Applied Physics Letters, Crop Science, Malaria Journal, Journal of Comparative Economics and Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact