Stephen C. Ainlay

19 papers receiving 427 citations

Peers

Stephen C. Ainlay
Comparison fields: 5 of 84
  • Health 155
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 20
  • Sociology and Political Science 227
  • Social Psychology 90
  • Clinical Psychology 86
Replace R.R. Ganzevoort with:
R.R. Ganzevoort Netherlands
Gwendolyn T. Sorell United States
Glennys Howarth United Kingdom
Patricia D. Rozée United States
Victoria L. Pitts United States
Lyle E. Larson Canada
Bradley C. Courtenay United States
Herbert C. Covey United States
Tamara Beauboeuf–Lafontant United States
Jean L. Briggs Canada
Stephen C. Ainlay relative to R.R. Ganzevoort Netherlands R.R. Ganzevoort's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
R.R. Ganzevoort · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Stephen C. Ainlay

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen C. Ainlay's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen C. Ainlay with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen C. Ainlay more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen C. Ainlay

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen C. Ainlay. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen C. Ainlay. The network helps show where Stephen C. Ainlay may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 20 scholars most cited alongside Stephen C. Ainlay, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Stephen C. Ainlay Line = papers co-authored together Stephen C. Ainlay links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 23 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1984113
2 1987107
3 199267
4 198462
5 198656
6 198921
7 198316
8 198814
9 198814
10 198612
11 19909
12 19868
13 19886
14 19966
15 19915
16 19935
17 19882
18 19962
19 19881
20 20240

About Stephen C. Ainlay

Stephen C. Ainlay is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Philosophy, Plant Science, Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology and Health, having authored 23 papers that have together received 526 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Agriculture and Farm Safety (3 papers), Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology (2 papers), Aging and Gerontology Research (2 papers), Religious Studies and Spiritual Practices (2 papers), Religion, Society, and Development (2 papers), Religion and Society Interactions (2 papers), Tactile and Sensory Interactions (1 paper) and Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Health (155 citations), Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (20 citations), Sociology and Political Science (227 citations), Social Psychology (90 citations) and Clinical Psychology (86 citations). Stephen C. Ainlay has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Ninian Smart, Gaylene Becker, Lerita M. Coleman, Douglas R. Smith, Michael L. Radelet, Royce Singleton, Victoria Lynn Swigert, Joan Ablon, James Davison Hunter and Leo Driedger. Their work appears in journals such as Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews, Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, Review of Religious Research, Social Forces and Journal of Social Issues.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact