Stephen Bocking
Impact in
-
- American Environmental and Regional History
- Ecological Modeling top 10%
- Species Distribution and Climate Change
Papers in
-
- American Environmental and Regional History 14
- Ecology 10
- Ecology and biodiversity studies 4
- Co-authors
- Mark Groulx (1 shared paper)Christopher J. Lemieux (1 shared paper)Ross McKitrick (1 shared paper)Christopher Essex (1 shared paper)W. J. Christie (1 shared paper)Sara Wylie (1 shared paper)Thomas H. Whillans (1 shared paper)Lauren Richter (1 shared paper)
In The Last Decade
Stephen Bocking
36 papers receiving 371 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 103
- Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law 85
- Ecological Modeling 30
- Global and Planetary Change 130
- History and Philosophy of Science 27
- Geography, Planning and Development 22
Countries citing papers authored by Stephen Bocking
This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen Bocking's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen Bocking with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen Bocking more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen Bocking
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen Bocking. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen Bocking. The network helps show where Stephen Bocking may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 19 scholars most cited alongside Stephen Bocking, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 42 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2004 | 103 | |
| 2 | 2018 | 37 | |
| 3 | 2018 | 29 | |
| 4 | 2007 | 27 | |
| 5 | 1994 | 26 | |
| 6 | 2005 | 18 | |
| 7 | 2004 | 18 | |
| 8 | 2000 | 16 | |
| 9 | 1995 | 16 | |
| 10 | 2017 | 14 | |
| 11 | 2011 | 12 | |
| 12 | 2018 | 12 | |
| 13 | 2009 | 11 | |
| 14 | 2010 | 10 | |
| 15 | 2006 | 10 | |
| 16 | 2015 | 10 | |
| 17 | 1997 | 10 | |
| 18 | 1999 | 8 | |
| 19 | 1990 | 8 | |
| 20 | 2012 | 6 |
About Stephen Bocking
Stephen Bocking is a scholar working on Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, Ecology, Sociology and Political Science, Global and Planetary Change and History and Philosophy of Science, having authored 42 papers that have together received 439 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include American Environmental and Regional History (14 papers), Indigenous Studies and Ecology (5 papers), Ecology and biodiversity studies (4 papers), History of Science and Natural History (4 papers), Canadian Identity and History (4 papers), Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management (4 papers), Global Energy and Sustainability Research (3 papers) and Botany and Plant Ecology Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law (85 citations), Ecological Modeling (30 citations), Global and Planetary Change (130 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (27 citations) and Geography, Planning and Development (22 citations). Stephen Bocking has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, France and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Mark Groulx, Christopher J. Lemieux, Ross McKitrick, Christopher Essex, W. J. Christie, Sara Wylie, Thomas H. Whillans, Lauren Richter, Rebecca Lave and Lindsey Dillon. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the History of Biology, Isis, Environmental History, Canadian Geographies / Géographies canadiennes and Urban History Review.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.