Stephen Best
Impact in
- Ophthalmology top 5%
- Glaucoma and retinal disorders
- Retinal Diseases and Treatments
-
- Corneal surgery and disorders
- Corneal Surgery and Treatments
- Retinal and Macular Surgery
- Retinopathy of Prematurity Studies
Papers in
-
- Glaucoma and retinal disorders 6
- Retinal Diseases and Treatments 3
- Ocular Diseases and Behçet’s Syndrome 2
- Ophthalmology and Visual Health Research 1
- Drug-Induced Ocular Toxicity 1
-
- Corneal surgery and disorders 2
- Co-authors
- Andrea L. Vincent (2 shared papers)Helen V. Danesh‐Meyer (1 shared paper)Hussain Y Patel (1 shared paper)Monika Pradhan (1 shared paper)Dianne Sharp (1 shared paper)Michael S. Vaphiades (1 shared paper)David J. King (1 shared paper)Paul A. Bell (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology (3 papers)Journal of Glaucoma (2 papers)The British Journal of Psychiatry (1 paper)Survey of Ophthalmology (1 paper)Ophthalmic Genetics (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- New ZealandUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Stephen Best
10 papers receiving 85 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 34
- Ophthalmology 61
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 32
- Biological Psychiatry 2
- Sensory Systems 3
- Neurology 4
Countries citing papers authored by Stephen Best
This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen Best's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen Best with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen Best more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen Best
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen Best. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen Best. The network helps show where Stephen Best may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Stephen Best, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2011 | 20 | |
| 2 | 2006 | 12 | |
| 3 | 2017 | 11 | |
| 4 | 2010 | 10 | |
| 5 | 2000 | 9 | |
| 6 | 1992 | 8 | |
| 7 | 2001 | 6 | |
| 8 | 2018 | 4 | |
| 9 | 1987 | 4 | |
| 10 | 1997 | 3 |
About Stephen Best
Stephen Best is a scholar working on Ophthalmology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Infectious Diseases, Social Psychology and Neurology, having authored 10 papers that have together received 87 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Glaucoma and retinal disorders (6 papers), Retinal Diseases and Treatments (3 papers), Corneal surgery and disorders (2 papers), Ocular Diseases and Behçet’s Syndrome (2 papers), Genetic Associations and Epidemiology (1 paper), Ophthalmology and Visual Health Research (1 paper), Drug-Induced Ocular Toxicity (1 paper) and Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (61 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (32 citations), Biological Psychiatry (2 citations), Sensory Systems (3 citations) and Neurology (4 citations). Stephen Best has collaborated with scholars based in New Zealand, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Andrea L. Vincent, Helen V. Danesh‐Meyer, Hussain Y Patel, Monika Pradhan, Dianne Sharp, Michael S. Vaphiades, David J. King, Paul A. Bell, S A Vernon and Donald Minckler. Their work appears in journals such as Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology, Journal of Glaucoma, The British Journal of Psychiatry, Survey of Ophthalmology and Ophthalmic Genetics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.