Jamie E. Craig

24.7k citations
314 papers · 8.9k · h-index 50

Impact in

Papers in

Jamie E. Craig

309 papers receiving 8.8k citations

Peers

Jamie E. Craig
Comparison fields: 5 of 153
  • Ophthalmology 4.1k
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 1.8k
  • Genetics 630
  • Hematology 482
  • Molecular Biology 2.6k
Replace Scott E. Brodie with:
Scott E. Brodie United States
Menno van Lookeren Campagne United States
Richard A. Lewis United States
Carmen Ayuso Spain
Toichiro Kuwabara United States
Michael B. Gorin United States
Khaled K. Abu‐Amero Saudi Arabia
David L. Epstein United States
Stefan Seregard Sweden
Wallace L.M. Alward United States
Jamie E. Craig relative to Scott E. Brodie United States Scott E. Brodie's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.9×
Scott E. Brodie · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jamie E. Craig

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jamie E. Craig's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jamie E. Craig with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jamie E. Craig more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jamie E. Craig

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jamie E. Craig. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jamie E. Craig. The network helps show where Jamie E. Craig may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jamie E. Craig, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jamie E. Craig Line = papers co-authored together Jamie E. Craig links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 314 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1999455
2 2004291
3 2015181
4 2001173
5 2009168
6 2003140
7 2008137
8 1994134
9 1996133
10 2007129
11 1994123
12 2002120
13 2015110
14 2003105
15 2005105
16 2010103
17 2003102
18
Evaluation of the myocilin (MYOC) glaucoma gene in monkey and human steroid-induced ocular hypertension.
200199
19 200794
20 200788

About Jamie E. Craig

Jamie E. Craig is a scholar working on Ophthalmology, Molecular Biology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Genetics and Epidemiology, having authored 314 papers that have together received 8.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Glaucoma and retinal disorders (127 papers), Retinal Diseases and Treatments (49 papers), Corneal surgery and disorders (30 papers), Connexins and lens biology (24 papers), Retinal Imaging and Analysis (18 papers), Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies (13 papers), Iron Metabolism and Disorders (11 papers) and Hemoglobinopathies and Related Disorders (11 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (4.1k citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (1.8k citations), Genetics (630 citations), Hematology (482 citations) and Molecular Biology (2.6k citations). Jamie E. Craig has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include David A. Mackey, Alex W. Hewitt, Kathryn P. Burdon, Shiwani Sharma, John Landers, Richard Mills, David P. Dimasi, Emmanuelle Souzeau, Sotoodeh Abhary and Tim Henderson. Their work appears in journals such as Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology, Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, American Journal of Ophthalmology, PLoS ONE and British Journal of Ophthalmology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact