Stephen B. Oates

20 papers receiving 138 citations

Peers

Stephen B. Oates
Comparison fields: 5 of 53
  • History 58
  • Marketing 37
  • Sociology and Political Science 137
  • Political Science and International Relations 71
  • Philosophy 29
Replace Richard P. Gildrie with:
Richard P. Gildrie United States
Marcus Cunliffe United Kingdom
Lawrence Delbert Cress United States
Merton L. Dillon United States
Ruth H. Bloch United States
Gustaaf Van Cromphout United States
William Pencak United States
Louise L. Stevenson United States
Emma J. Lapsansky United States
Stephen Botein United States
Stephen B. Oates relative to Richard P. Gildrie United States Richard P. Gildrie's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.3×
Richard P. Gildrie · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Stephen B. Oates

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen B. Oates's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen B. Oates with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen B. Oates more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen B. Oates

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen B. Oates. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen B. Oates. The network helps show where Stephen B. Oates may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 13 scholars most cited alongside Stephen B. Oates, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Stephen B. Oates Line = papers co-authored together Stephen B. Oates links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 30 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 198372
2 197141
3 197528
4 197827
5 198713
6 198510
7
With Malice Toward None
19779
8
Let the Trumpet Sound
19828
9 19778
10 19838
11
Biography as high adventure
19866
12 19715
13 19952
14 19942
15 19622
16
Biography as history
19912
17 19762
18 19642
19
Portrait of America
19732
20 19791

About Stephen B. Oates

Stephen B. Oates is a scholar working on Marketing, Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science, History and Anthropology, having authored 30 papers that have together received 256 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include American History and Culture (13 papers), American Constitutional Law and Politics (10 papers), Race, History, and American Society (6 papers), American Political and Social Dynamics (3 papers), Archaeology and Natural History (3 papers), Biographical and Historical Analysis (2 papers), Data Analysis and Archiving (2 papers) and Music Technology and Sound Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in History (58 citations), Marketing (37 citations), Sociology and Political Science (137 citations), Political Science and International Relations (71 citations) and Philosophy (29 citations). Stephen B. Oates has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Elliott Rudwick, Merton L. Dillon, James A. Rawley, Martin Ridge, Richard N. Current, David A. Nichols, Richard O. Curry, W. Turrentine Jackson, Herbert Aptheker and Don S. Richards. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of American History, The American Historical Review, The Journal of Southern History, Reviews in American History and Civil War history.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact