Stephen Archer
Impact in
- Gastroenterology top 5%
- Gastroesophageal reflux and treatments
- Surgery top 10%
- Pediatric Hepatobiliary Diseases and Treatments
- Esophageal and GI Pathology
- Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes
Papers in
- Surgery 6
- Esophageal and GI Pathology 2
- Eosinophilic Esophagitis 2
-
- Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes 2
- Co-authors
- John G. Hunter (3 shared papers)Gene D. Branum (2 shared papers)C. Daniel Smith (2 shared papers)David Brown (1 shared paper)Timothy M. Farrell (1 shared paper)Kathy Galloway (1 shared paper)Glenn D. Warden (1 shared paper)Robert H. Bower (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- World Journal of Surgery (1 paper)The American Surgeon (1 paper)Surgical Endoscopy (1 paper)Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing (1 paper)The Journal of Clinical Pharmacology (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesAustraliaUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Stephen Archer
11 papers receiving 522 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 63
- Gastroenterology 91
- Surgery 402
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 241
- Emergency Medicine 68
- Rehabilitation 38
Countries citing papers authored by Stephen Archer
This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen Archer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen Archer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen Archer more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen Archer
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen Archer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen Archer. The network helps show where Stephen Archer may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Stephen Archer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2001 | 254 | |
| 2 | 2000 | 63 | |
| 3 | 1997 | 58 | |
| 4 | 2022 | 51 | |
| 5 | 1998 | 36 | |
| 6 | 1996 | 28 | |
| 7 | 2006 | 27 | |
| 8 | 1998 | 15 | |
| 9 | 2000 | 9 | |
| 10 | 1995 | 5 | |
| 11 | 1998 | 5 |
About Stephen Archer
Stephen Archer is a scholar working on Surgery, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Emergency Medicine, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Oncology, having authored 11 papers that have together received 551 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Burn Injury Management and Outcomes (2 papers), Esophageal and GI Pathology (2 papers), Gastroesophageal reflux and treatments (2 papers), Eosinophilic Esophagitis (2 papers), Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (2 papers), Gallbladder and Bile Duct Disorders (2 papers), Appendicitis Diagnosis and Management (2 papers) and Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Gastroenterology (91 citations), Surgery (402 citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (241 citations), Emergency Medicine (68 citations) and Rehabilitation (38 citations). Stephen Archer has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include John G. Hunter, Gene D. Branum, C. Daniel Smith, David Brown, Timothy M. Farrell, Kathy Galloway, Glenn D. Warden, Robert H. Bower, David G. Greenhalgh and Michael S. Nussbaum. Their work appears in journals such as World Journal of Surgery, The American Surgeon, Surgical Endoscopy, Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing and The Journal of Clinical Pharmacology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.