Stephanie Reading

26 papers receiving 649 citations

Peers

Stephanie Reading
Comparison fields: 5 of 81
  • Family Practice 17
  • Pharmacy 29
  • Clinical Psychology 123
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 123
  • Surgery 164
Replace Amy Laura Arnold with:
Amy Laura Arnold United States
Jung Hye Sung United States
Adrian Brady United Kingdom
Jennifer Thompson United States
Sharon Edwards United Kingdom
Keith Churchwell United States
Kathryn King Canada
John M. Thomas United States
Françoise G. Pradel United States
Yingjie Weng United States
Stephanie Reading relative to Amy Laura Arnold United States Amy Laura Arnold's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×7.3×
Amy Laura Arnold · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Stephanie Reading

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephanie Reading's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephanie Reading with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephanie Reading more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephanie Reading

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephanie Reading. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephanie Reading. The network helps show where Stephanie Reading may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Stephanie Reading, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Stephanie Reading Line = papers co-authored together Stephanie Reading links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 26 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2020115
2 2014109
3 202067
4 201756
5 200752
6 200546
7 201940
8 200932
9 201928
10 202026
11 199319
12 202218
13 201916
14 202110
15 20218
16 20225
17 20215
18 20214
19 20224
20
Developing the role of the practice nurse in diabetic care.
19873

About Stephanie Reading

Stephanie Reading is a scholar working on Surgery, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Clinical Psychology and Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, having authored 26 papers that have together received 671 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health (8 papers), Diabetes Management and Research (2 papers), Acute Myocardial Infarction Research (2 papers), Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment (2 papers), Migration, Health and Trauma (2 papers), Child Abuse and Trauma (1 paper), HIV-related health complications and treatments (1 paper) and Nursing Roles and Practices (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Family Practice (17 citations), Pharmacy (29 citations), Clinical Psychology (123 citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (123 citations) and Surgery (164 citations). Stephanie Reading has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Kristi Reynolds, Teresa N. Harrison, Sarah A. Ostrowski, Johanna K. P. Greeson, Paul J. Dluzniewski, Rebecca Vivrette, Matthew M. Clark, Ernestine C. Briggs, Christopher M. Layne and Robert S. Pynoos. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the American Heart Association, Clinical Epidemiology, Circulation Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes, BMC Cardiovascular Disorders and The Journal of Rheumatology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact