Stéphane Jean

47 papers receiving 472 citations

Peers

Stéphane Jean
Comparison fields: 5 of 68
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 145
  • Artificial Intelligence 230
  • Information Systems 142
  • Signal Processing 63
  • Computer Networks and Communications 130
Replace Katherine F. Moore with:
Katherine F. Moore United States
Koichi Furukawa Japan
Licia Sbattella Italy
Robert W. Taylor United States
Andrew Rowley United Kingdom
Bin Xia China
Kevin C. Kahn United States
Ronaldo Ribeiro Goldschmidt Brazil
André Ribeiro Portugal
Stéphane Jean relative to Katherine F. Moore United States Katherine F. Moore's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Katherine F. Moore · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Stéphane Jean

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stéphane Jean's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stéphane Jean with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stéphane Jean more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stéphane Jean

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stéphane Jean. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stéphane Jean. The network helps show where Stéphane Jean may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Stéphane Jean, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Stéphane Jean Line = papers co-authored together Stéphane Jean links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 56 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200882
2 200957
3 200742
4 200632
5 201428
6 201219
7 201517
8
Querying ontology based databases. The OntoQL proposal
200614
9 201513
10 200713
11 200813
12 201612
13 201411
14 20219
15 20169
16 20098
17 20158
18 20188
19 20146
20 20196

About Stéphane Jean

Stéphane Jean is a scholar working on Artificial Intelligence, Computer Networks and Communications, Information Systems, Signal Processing and Management Information Systems, having authored 56 papers that have together received 489 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Semantic Web and Ontologies (36 papers), Advanced Database Systems and Queries (29 papers), Service-Oriented Architecture and Web Services (19 papers), Data Management and Algorithms (18 papers), Business Process Modeling and Analysis (6 papers), Genetic Neurodegenerative Diseases (4 papers), Data Quality and Management (3 papers) and Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (145 citations), Artificial Intelligence (230 citations), Information Systems (142 citations), Signal Processing (63 citations) and Computer Networks and Communications (130 citations). Stéphane Jean has collaborated with scholars based in France, Canada and Algeria. Frequent co-authors include Guy Pierra, Ladjel Bellatreche, Jean Mathieu, Louis Richer, Luc Laberge, Yamine Aït‐Ameur, Allel Hadjali, Cynthia Gagnon, Yves Dauvilliers and Suzanne Veillette. Their work appears in journals such as Knowledge and Information Systems, Lecture notes in computer science, Clinical EEG and Neuroscience, Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation and Data & Knowledge Engineering.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact