Stephane Chartier

417 citations
11 papers · 310 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

Stephane Chartier

11 papers receiving 305 citations

Peers

Stephane Chartier
Comparison fields: 5 of 60
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 27
  • Physiology 113
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 70
  • Developmental Neuroscience 14
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 50
Replace Kathryn Luk with:
Kathryn Luk United States
Kazuya Honjoh Japan
Timo A. Nees Germany
Satoshi Tateda Japan
Kaori Gunjigake Japan
Chalonda R. Handy United States
Dominique Muschter Germany
Marc Cherruau France
Hirotaro Fukuoka Japan
Jiaguang Tang China
Stephane Chartier relative to Kathryn Luk United States Kathryn Luk's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
Kathryn Luk · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Stephane Chartier

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephane Chartier's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephane Chartier with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephane Chartier more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephane Chartier

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephane Chartier. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephane Chartier. The network helps show where Stephane Chartier may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 21 scholars most cited alongside Stephane Chartier, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Stephane Chartier Line = papers co-authored together Stephane Chartier links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

11 of 11 papers shown
#Work
1 2018101
2 201469
3 201444
4 201523
5 201722
6 201318
7 201913
8 201612
9
[Colonic adenocarcinoma and scleroderma].
19936
10 20231
11 20131

About Stephane Chartier

Stephane Chartier is a scholar working on Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Physiology, Surgery and Rheumatology, having authored 11 papers that have together received 310 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pain Mechanisms and Treatments (4 papers), Pain Management and Opioid Use (3 papers), Osteoarthritis Treatment and Mechanisms (2 papers), Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (2 papers), Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (2 papers), Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment (2 papers), Breast Lesions and Carcinomas (2 papers) and Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (27 citations), Physiology (113 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (70 citations), Developmental Neuroscience (14 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (50 citations). Stephane Chartier has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Mexico and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Patrick W. Mantyh, Lisa Majuta, Michelle L. Thompson, Geraldine Longo, Gwen McCaffrey, Elizabeth A. Burton, Brian L. West, Gaston Habets, Juan Miguel Jiménez‐Andrade and Paul Lin. Their work appears in journals such as Pain, Molecular Pain, Cancers, Journal of Clinical Oncology and Neuroscience.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact