Sten Rettrup

981 citations
46 papers · 871 · h-index 17

Impact in

Papers in

Sten Rettrup

46 papers receiving 818 citations

Peers

Sten Rettrup
Comparison fields: 5 of 62
  • Physical and Theoretical Chemistry 165
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 564
  • Spectroscopy 266
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 140
  • Biophysics 39
Replace Ruben Pauncz with:
Ruben Pauncz Israel
C. R. Sarma India
Steve Alexander United States
Poul J�rgensen Denmark
Hans Ulrich Suter Switzerland
P. Pulay Hungary
Helena Larsen Denmark
Maurice E. Schwartz United States
Darwin W. Smith United States
Roy Mcweeny Italy
Sten Rettrup relative to Ruben Pauncz Israel Ruben Pauncz's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
Ruben Pauncz · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Sten Rettrup

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Sten Rettrup's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sten Rettrup with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sten Rettrup more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Sten Rettrup

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sten Rettrup. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sten Rettrup. The network helps show where Sten Rettrup may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Sten Rettrup, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Sten Rettrup Line = papers co-authored together Sten Rettrup links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 46 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1982124
2 197782
3 198375
4 200954
5 201853
6 198644
7 198339
8 200438
9 198930
10 197727
11 198724
12 197723
13 200621
14 198818
15 198117
16 198617
17 198217
18 199415
19 199215
20 199812

About Sten Rettrup

Sten Rettrup is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Physical and Theoretical Chemistry, Spectroscopy, Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials and Catalysis, having authored 46 papers that have together received 871 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Chemical Physics Studies (25 papers), Molecular spectroscopy and chirality (10 papers), Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies (8 papers), Photochemistry and Electron Transfer Studies (7 papers), Magnetism in coordination complexes (6 papers), Matrix Theory and Algorithms (6 papers), Advanced NMR Techniques and Applications (4 papers) and Catalysis and Oxidation Reactions (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Physical and Theoretical Chemistry (165 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (564 citations), Spectroscopy (266 citations), Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (140 citations) and Biophysics (39 citations). Sten Rettrup has collaborated with scholars based in Denmark, India and Italy. Frequent co-authors include C. R. Sarma, Paolo Palmieri, Helge Johansen, Thomas D. Bouman, Aage E. Hansen, Stephan P. A. Sauer, Sine Larsen, Michael Gajhede, Kristian O. Sylvester‐Hvid and Gemma C. Solomon. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Quantum Chemistry, The Journal of Chemical Physics, Theoretical Chemistry Accounts, Chemical Physics and Chemical Physics Letters.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact