Steffanie Scott

68 papers receiving 1.6k citations

Peers

Steffanie Scott
Comparison fields: 5 of 122
  • General Agricultural and Biological Sciences 384
  • Business and International Management 65
  • Plant Science 614
  • Food Science 227
  • Strategy and Management 200
Replace Jeroen Candel with:
Jeroen Candel Netherlands
William G. Moseley United States
Marianne Penker Austria
Tālis Tīsenkopfs United Kingdom
Mindi Schneider Netherlands
Kees Jansen Netherlands
Olivier De Schutter Belgium
P.G.M. Hebinck Netherlands
Annie Shattuck United States
Carla Barbieri United States
Steffanie Scott relative to Jeroen Candel Netherlands Jeroen Candel's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
Jeroen Candel · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Steffanie Scott

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Steffanie Scott's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Steffanie Scott with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Steffanie Scott more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Steffanie Scott

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Steffanie Scott. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Steffanie Scott. The network helps show where Steffanie Scott may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Steffanie Scott, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Steffanie Scott Line = papers co-authored together Steffanie Scott links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 69 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2013112
2 2014105
3 200698
4 201589
5 201682
6 201581
7 200866
8 201760
9 201755
10 200853
11 201253
12 201941
13 200839
14 201536
15 200735
16 201632
17 201831
18 201831
19 201628
20 201428

About Steffanie Scott

Steffanie Scott is a scholar working on Plant Science, General Agricultural and Biological Sciences, Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science and Food Science, having authored 69 papers that have together received 1.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Organic Food and Agriculture (25 papers), Urban Agriculture and Sustainability (15 papers), Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development (13 papers), China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance (10 papers), Vietnamese History and Culture Studies (7 papers), Food Waste Reduction and Sustainability (6 papers), Land Rights and Reforms (6 papers) and Global trade, sustainability, and social impact (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Agricultural and Biological Sciences (384 citations), Business and International Management (65 citations), Plant Science (614 citations), Food Science (227 citations) and Strategy and Management (200 citations). Steffanie Scott has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, China and South Africa. Frequent co-authors include Zhenzhong Si, Theresa Schumilas, Taiyang Zhong, Yuhui Qiao, Fiona Miller, Xianjin Huang, Kate Lloyd, Jonathan Crush, Niels Halberg and Raymond Yu Wang. Their work appears in journals such as Geographical Research, Canadian Journal of Development Studies/Revue canadienne d études du développement, Asia Pacific Viewpoint, Sustainability and Agriculture and Human Values.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact