Stefan Klus

27 papers receiving 679 citations

Peers

Stefan Klus
Comparison fields: 5 of 73
  • Computational Mathematics 29
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 463
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 153
  • Computational Mechanics 139
  • Control and Systems Engineering 140
Replace Elias Jarlebring with:
Elias Jarlebring Sweden
Jared Callaham United States
Théo Mary France
Yunfeng Cai China
Brando Miranda United States
Alejandro Cósimo Argentina
Peter Giesl United Kingdom
J. Nathan Kutz United States
Michael E. Henderson United States
Charles Pezeshki United States
Stefan Klus relative to Elias Jarlebring Sweden Elias Jarlebring's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.6×
Elias Jarlebring · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Stefan Klus

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stefan Klus's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stefan Klus with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stefan Klus more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stefan Klus

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stefan Klus. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stefan Klus. The network helps show where Stefan Klus may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 23 scholars most cited alongside Stefan Klus, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Stefan Klus Line = papers co-authored together Stefan Klus links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 30 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2020182
2 2019131
3 201792
4 201959
5 202036
6 201735
7 201927
8 202322
9 201921
10 201712
11 200511
12 202310
13 20219
14 20219
15 20209
16 20227
17 20225
18 20244
19 20244
20 20103

About Stefan Klus

Stefan Klus is a scholar working on Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, Artificial Intelligence, Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, Molecular Biology and Numerical Analysis, having authored 30 papers that have together received 699 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Model Reduction and Neural Networks (19 papers), Probabilistic and Robust Engineering Design (8 papers), Neural Networks and Applications (5 papers), Gaussian Processes and Bayesian Inference (5 papers), Numerical methods for differential equations (4 papers), Protein Structure and Dynamics (3 papers), Tensor decomposition and applications (3 papers) and Complex Network Analysis Techniques (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Computational Mathematics (29 citations), Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (463 citations), Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (153 citations), Computational Mechanics (139 citations) and Control and Systems Engineering (140 citations). Stefan Klus has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Sebastian Peitz, Feliks Nüske, Christof Schütte, Cecilia Clementi, Péter Koltai, Ingmar Schuster, Krikamol Muandet, Frank Noé, Fabian Paul and Hao Wu. Their work appears in journals such as Physica D Nonlinear Phenomena, Journal of Nonlinear Science, The Journal of Chemical Physics, Acta Numerica and Journal of Computational Physics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact