Stan J. Thomas

402 citations
17 papers · 313 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

Stan J. Thomas

17 papers receiving 279 citations

Peers

Stan J. Thomas
Comparison fields: 5 of 45
  • Signal Processing 161
  • Computer Networks and Communications 207
  • Artificial Intelligence 167
  • Computer Science Applications 14
  • Information Systems 55
Replace Shi-Kuo Chang with:
Shi-Kuo Chang United States
Akira Yamada Japan
Timothy Arndt United States
Mark Gondree United States
David Broneske Germany
Ivar Jørstad Norway
Utz Westermann Austria
Daniel Sagalowicz United States
Su Mon Kywe Singapore
Michael Kay Australia
Stan J. Thomas relative to Shi-Kuo Chang United States Shi-Kuo Chang's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Shi-Kuo Chang · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Stan J. Thomas

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stan J. Thomas's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stan J. Thomas with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stan J. Thomas more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stan J. Thomas

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stan J. Thomas. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stan J. Thomas. The network helps show where Stan J. Thomas may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 10 scholars most cited alongside Stan J. Thomas, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Stan J. Thomas Line = papers co-authored together Stan J. Thomas links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
#Work
1
Nested Relational Structures.
1986147
2 198542
3 200526
4 200423
5
A non-first-normal-form relational database model
198319
6 199814
7 201414
8 20187
9 19986
10 20054
11 19983
12 19982
13 20202
14 20101
15 20101
16 19981
17
Symbolic inversion of control relationships in model-based expert systems
19881

About Stan J. Thomas

Stan J. Thomas is a scholar working on Information Systems, Computer Networks and Communications, Media Technology, Computer Science Applications and Molecular Biology, having authored 17 papers that have together received 313 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Experimental Learning in Engineering (4 papers), Teaching and Learning Programming (4 papers), Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks (3 papers), Gene Regulatory Network Analysis (3 papers), Information Systems Education and Curriculum Development (3 papers), Cloud Computing and Resource Management (2 papers), Advanced Database Systems and Queries (2 papers) and Microbial Metabolic Engineering and Bioproduction (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Signal Processing (161 citations), Computer Networks and Communications (207 citations), Artificial Intelligence (167 citations), Computer Science Applications (14 citations) and Information Systems (55 citations). Stan J. Thomas has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Japan and Ireland. Frequent co-authors include Patrick C. Fischer, Dirk Van Gucht, Norman P. Jouppi, Jacquelyn S. Fetrow, Larry W. Daniel, Cary Laxer, Rajendra K. Raj, Michael J. Oudshoorn, Allen Parrish and James L. Norris. Their work appears in journals such as Communications of the ACM, Journal of Theoretical Biology, Journal of Computer and System Sciences, ACM SIGCSE Bulletin and Papers on Engineering Education Repository (American Society for Engineering Education).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact