Stacey Wolfson

1.7k citations
26 papers · 361 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Stacey Wolfson

21 papers receiving 349 citations

Peers

Stacey Wolfson
Comparison fields: 5 of 54
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 242
  • Sensory Systems 15
  • General Decision Sciences 6
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 68
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 79
Replace Binh T. Pham with:
Binh T. Pham United States
Stuart J. Starr United States
R. F. Wagner United States
Avi Aizenman United States
Gunvant Chaudhari United States
Denise C. Varner United States
A. van Meeteren Netherlands
David L. Still United States
James Man Git Tsui Canada
Bernd Lingelbach Germany
Stacey Wolfson relative to Binh T. Pham United States Binh T. Pham's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×8×9.9×
Binh T. Pham · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Stacey Wolfson

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stacey Wolfson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stacey Wolfson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stacey Wolfson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stacey Wolfson

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stacey Wolfson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stacey Wolfson. The network helps show where Stacey Wolfson may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 19 scholars most cited alongside Stacey Wolfson, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Stacey Wolfson Line = papers co-authored together Stacey Wolfson links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 26 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199570
2 201859
3 199855
4 202229
5 199926
6 200622
7 200114
8 200413
9 200113
10 200013
11 20099
12 20079
13 20068
14 20016
15 20225
16 20053
17 20102
18 20042
19
Increment and decrement probes in the probed-sinewave paradigm
20001
20 20101

About Stacey Wolfson

Stacey Wolfson is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Surgery and Molecular Biology, having authored 26 papers that have together received 361 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Visual perception and processing mechanisms (22 papers), Color Science and Applications (15 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (8 papers), Aesthetic Perception and Analysis (5 papers), Image Enhancement Techniques (3 papers), Lymphadenopathy Diagnosis and Analysis (2 papers), Retinal Development and Disorders (2 papers) and Image and Video Quality Assessment (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (242 citations), Sensory Systems (15 citations), General Decision Sciences (6 citations), Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (68 citations) and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (79 citations). Stacey Wolfson has collaborated with scholars based in United States and France. Frequent co-authors include Michael S. Landy, Norma Graham, Eric Kim, Linda Moy, Krzysztof J. Geras, Yiqiu Shen, Nan Wu, Jingyi Su, Kyunghyun Cho and Quraish Ghadiali. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Vision, Vision Research, Radiology, Visual Neuroscience and Journal of the Optical Society of America A.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact