Stacey Reading

29 papers receiving 647 citations

Peers

Stacey Reading
Comparison fields: 5 of 96
  • Sensory Systems 204
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 112
  • Physiology 170
  • Nutrition and Dietetics 92
  • Complementary and alternative medicine 48
Replace Erzsébet Lizanecz with:
Erzsébet Lizanecz Hungary
Naoki Aizawa Japan
Rebecca L. Bertrand Australia
Ting Ruan Taiwan
Katarzyna Pawlak-Osińska Poland
Chizuko Watanabe Japan
Takahisa Ushiroyama Japan
Ludmila Filaretova Russia
Ana Charrua Portugal
Prem K.G. Chandran United States
Stacey Reading relative to Erzsébet Lizanecz Hungary Erzsébet Lizanecz's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.8×
Erzsébet Lizanecz · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Stacey Reading

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stacey Reading's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stacey Reading with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stacey Reading more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stacey Reading

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stacey Reading. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stacey Reading. The network helps show where Stacey Reading may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Stacey Reading, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Stacey Reading Line = papers co-authored together Stacey Reading links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 31 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2017203
2 2004135
3 2008105
4 200772
5 202324
6 202116
7 201310
8 20029
9 20039
10 20019
11 20188
12 20037
13 20037
14 20046
15 20155
16 20135
17 20235
18 20244
19 20194
20 20164

About Stacey Reading

Stacey Reading is a scholar working on Complementary and alternative medicine, Physiology, Molecular Biology, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine and Rehabilitation, having authored 31 papers that have together received 658 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cardiovascular and exercise physiology (8 papers), Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (4 papers), Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention (4 papers), Ion channel regulation and function (4 papers), Ion Channels and Receptors (4 papers), Cardiovascular Effects of Exercise (3 papers), Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts (2 papers) and Thermoregulation and physiological responses (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Sensory Systems (204 citations), Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (112 citations), Physiology (170 citations), Nutrition and Dietetics (92 citations) and Complementary and alternative medicine (48 citations). Stacey Reading has collaborated with scholars based in New Zealand, Canada and United States. Frequent co-authors include Joseph E. Brayden, Scott Earley, Graeme Carrick‐Ranson, Lance C. Dalleck, Paul B. Nolan, James W. Stinear, Donald G. Welsh, Mark T. Nelson, J. K. Barclay and Erin J. Howden. Their work appears in journals such as Canadian Journal of Physiology and Pharmacology, Journal of the Association for Information Systems, BMJ Open, Gait & Posture and Quality of Life Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact