Stacey Culp

49 papers receiving 1.5k citations

Peers

Stacey Culp
Comparison fields: 5 of 116
  • Research and Theory 22
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 24
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 394
  • Nephrology 91
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 134
Replace Jennifer Manning with:
Jennifer Manning United States
Yi‐Hao Weng Taiwan
John W. Runyan United States
Dana Flanders United States
Stephen Chua United Kingdom
Linda Johnson Sweden
Ken Gu Singapore
Lufei Young United States
Francisco Franco‐Marina Mexico
Tingting Geng China
Stacey Culp relative to Jennifer Manning United States Jennifer Manning's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Jennifer Manning · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Stacey Culp

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stacey Culp's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stacey Culp with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stacey Culp more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stacey Culp

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stacey Culp. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stacey Culp. The network helps show where Stacey Culp may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Stacey Culp, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Stacey Culp Line = papers co-authored together Stacey Culp links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 55 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2010278
2 1998228
3 2013133
4 2014104
5 201090
6 201369
7 201859
8 201451
9 201746
10 201539
11 201535
12 201434
13 201531
14 201528
15 202325
16 201724
17 201623
18 201422
19 201521
20 201719

About Stacey Culp

Stacey Culp is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Surgery, Oncology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, having authored 55 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research (8 papers), Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (8 papers), Pancreatitis Pathology and Treatment (7 papers), BRCA gene mutations in cancer (5 papers), Health Sciences Research and Education (3 papers), Suicide and Self-Harm Studies (3 papers), Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (3 papers) and Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Research and Theory (22 citations), Issues, ethics and legal aspects (24 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (394 citations), Nephrology (91 citations) and Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (134 citations). Stacey Culp has collaborated with scholars based in United States, South Sudan and France. Frequent co-authors include Alvin H. Moss, June R. Lunney, Jean Jenkins, Laurie Badzek, Miklos Auber, Jame Abraham, Sobha Kurian, John Rogers, Joanne R. Duffy and Daniel D. Matlock. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, JONA The Journal of Nursing Administration, Pancreatology, The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation and Journal of Clinical Oncology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact