S.M. Thomas
Impact in
- Genetics top 5%
- Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology
- Biochemistry top 5%
Papers in
-
- Photosynthetic Processes and Mechanisms 4
- DNA Repair Mechanisms 3
-
- Plant responses to elevated CO2 6
- Co-authors
- C W Price (5 shared papers)Roger T. Dean (5 shared papers)S A Boylan (4 shared papers)S. Kalman (3 shared papers)G. N. Thorne (6 shared papers)Ann Rutherford (1 shared paper)Tom ap Rees (3 shared papers)Janusz M. Gebicki (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- Journal of Bacteriology (6 papers)Toxicology in Vitro (6 papers)Annals of Botany (4 papers)Biochemical Society Transactions (3 papers)Journal of Experimental Botany (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesAustralia
In The Last Decade
S.M. Thomas
56 papers receiving 1.7k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 142
- Genetics 491
- Biochemistry 87
- Molecular Biology 933
- Agronomy and Crop Science 131
- Plant Science 407
Countries citing papers authored by S.M. Thomas
This map shows the geographic impact of S.M. Thomas's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by S.M. Thomas with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites S.M. Thomas more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by S.M. Thomas
This network shows the impact of papers produced by S.M. Thomas. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by S.M. Thomas. The network helps show where S.M. Thomas may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside S.M. Thomas, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 57 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1998 | 144 | |
| 2 | 1990 | 143 | |
| 3 | 1992 | 138 | |
| 4 | 1986 | 87 | |
| 5 | 1990 | 82 | |
| 6 | 1994 | 80 | |
| 7 | 1987 | 69 | |
| 8 | 1994 | 69 | |
| 9 | 1989 | 61 | |
| 10 | 1989 | 60 | |
| 11 | 2003 | 55 | |
| 12 | 1978 | 50 | |
| 13 | 1989 | 48 | |
| 14 | 1990 | 47 | |
| 15 | 2006 | 45 | |
| 16 | 1978 | 37 | |
| 17 | 1975 | 36 | |
| 18 | 1985 | 29 | |
| 19 | Models for the in vitro assessment of neurotoxicity in the nervous system in relation to xenobiotic and neurotrophic factor-mediated events. | 1992 | 28 |
| 20 | 1993 | 26 |
About S.M. Thomas
S.M. Thomas is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Plant Science, Genetics, Ecology and Neurology, having authored 57 papers that have together received 1.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology (9 papers), Bacteriophages and microbial interactions (7 papers), Plant responses to elevated CO2 (6 papers), Crop Yield and Soil Fertility (4 papers), Photosynthetic Processes and Mechanisms (4 papers), DNA Repair Mechanisms (3 papers), Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Research (3 papers) and Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Genetics (491 citations), Biochemistry (87 citations), Molecular Biology (933 citations), Agronomy and Crop Science (131 citations) and Plant Science (407 citations). S.M. Thomas has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include C W Price, Roger T. Dean, S A Boylan, S. Kalman, G. N. Thorne, Ann Rutherford, Tom ap Rees, Janusz M. Gebicki, Joo‐Won Suh and A. Garner. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Bacteriology, Toxicology in Vitro, Annals of Botany, Biochemical Society Transactions and Journal of Experimental Botany.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.