Simon J. Enright

670 citations
13 papers · 482 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Simon J. Enright

12 papers receiving 445 citations

Peers

Simon J. Enright
Comparison fields: 5 of 51
  • Clinical Psychology 281
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 178
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 185
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 123
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 39
Replace Corinna N. Scheel with:
Corinna N. Scheel Germany
Karen Lynn Cassiday United States
Tasha M. Nienow United States
Johan Verwoerd Netherlands
Pedro Marset Spain
Natasha Vorontsova United Kingdom
Hella Hiss Germany
Helen Spencer United Kingdom
Marco Garzitto Italy
Marie-Christine Gély-Nargeot France
Simon J. Enright relative to Corinna N. Scheel Germany Corinna N. Scheel's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
Corinna N. Scheel · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Simon J. Enright

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Simon J. Enright's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Simon J. Enright with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Simon J. Enright more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Simon J. Enright

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Simon J. Enright. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Simon J. Enright. The network helps show where Simon J. Enright may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 20 scholars most cited alongside Simon J. Enright, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Simon J. Enright Line = papers co-authored together Simon J. Enright links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

13 of 13 papers shown
#Work
1 1993135
2 199076
3 199363
4 201647
5 199746
6 199538
7 201526
8 199123
9 199414
10 20157
11 20214
12 19892
13 19921

About Simon J. Enright

Simon J. Enright is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Psychiatry and Mental health and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, having authored 13 papers that have together received 482 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (7 papers), Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders (6 papers), Schizophrenia research and treatment (3 papers), Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (3 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (2 papers), Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (1 paper), Dental Anxiety and Anesthesia Techniques (1 paper) and Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (281 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (178 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (185 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (123 citations) and Developmental and Educational Psychology (39 citations). Simon J. Enright has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Netherlands and Austria. Frequent co-authors include Anthony R. Beech, Gordon Claridge, Suzanna Rose, Craig Steel, Til Wykes, M. Fazil Baksh, Diana Rose, Kim T. Mueser, Jennifer D. Gottlieb and S.M. Kemp-Wheeler. Their work appears in journals such as Personality and Individual Differences, Psychological Medicine, Journal of Mental Health, BMC Psychiatry and British Journal of Clinical Psychology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact