Silas Halperin

405 citations
18 papers · 300 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

Silas Halperin

18 papers receiving 269 citations

Peers

Silas Halperin
Comparison fields: 5 of 67
  • Statistics and Probability 79
  • Applied Psychology 42
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 22
  • Physiology 87
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 40
Replace Lynette J. Epp with:
Lynette J. Epp Canada
Yan Huo United States
Samuel Karson United States
Alexander Siegman United States
Kyungmee Park South Korea
J. B. Chassan United States
Thomas Storm Canada
Raquel Rodríguez‐Fernández Spain
Henry R. Burke United States
Michele Tine United States
Silas Halperin relative to Lynette J. Epp Canada Lynette J. Epp's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.1×
Lynette J. Epp · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Silas Halperin

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Silas Halperin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Silas Halperin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Silas Halperin more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Silas Halperin

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Silas Halperin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Silas Halperin. The network helps show where Silas Halperin may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 18 scholars most cited alongside Silas Halperin, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Silas Halperin Line = papers co-authored together Silas Halperin links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
#Work
1 199379
2 199363
3 197862
4
Matching theory applied to contingent teacher attention
199034
5 19829
6 19869
7 19758
8 19668
9 19757
10 19766
11 19754
12 19823
13 19712
14 19762
15 19711
16 20031
17 19711
18 19691

About Silas Halperin

Silas Halperin is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Statistics and Probability, Social Psychology, Applied Psychology and Computer Networks and Communications, having authored 18 papers that have together received 300 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Statistical Methods and Models (2 papers), Mental Health Research Topics (2 papers), Cognitive Abilities and Testing (2 papers), Chaos-based Image/Signal Encryption (1 paper), Behavioral Health and Interventions (1 paper), Statistics Education and Methodologies (1 paper), Psychological Testing and Assessment (1 paper) and School Choice and Performance (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Statistics and Probability (79 citations), Applied Psychology (42 citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (22 citations), Physiology (87 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (40 citations). Silas Halperin has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Lawrence B. Feinberg, Kate B. Carey, Michael P. Carey, Christina Richards, Brian K. Martens, Michael Dolker, John R. Gleason, D. C. Rao, Paul R. Lohnes and Newton E. Morton. Their work appears in journals such as Educational and Psychological Measurement, Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, Psychometrika, Journal of Clinical Psychology and Systems Research and Behavioral Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact