Sigrid Schmalzer
Impact in
-
- History of Science and Medicine
- Historical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis
- History of Science and Natural History
-
- Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development
Papers in
-
- Chinese history and philosophy 10
-
- Historical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis 3
- Diverse Historical and Scientific Studies 2
- History of Science and Medicine 2
Sigrid Schmalzer
17 papers receiving 222 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 66
- History and Philosophy of Science 52
- General Agricultural and Biological Sciences 63
- Political Science and International Relations 83
- Anthropology 32
- Sociology and Political Science 128
Countries citing papers authored by Sigrid Schmalzer
This map shows the geographic impact of Sigrid Schmalzer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sigrid Schmalzer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sigrid Schmalzer more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Sigrid Schmalzer
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sigrid Schmalzer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sigrid Schmalzer. The network helps show where Sigrid Schmalzer may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 2 scholars most cited alongside Sigrid Schmalzer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2015 | 62 | |
| 2 | Red Revolution, Green Revolution: Scientific Farming in Socialist China | 2016 | 50 |
| 3 | 2008 | 43 | |
| 4 | The People's Peking Man: Popular Science and Human Identity in Twentieth-Century China | 2008 | 36 |
| 5 | 2017 | 28 | |
| 6 | 2016 | 12 | |
| 7 | 2002 | 10 | |
| 8 | 2007 | 8 | |
| 9 | 2009 | 8 | |
| 10 | 2017 | 6 | |
| 11 | 2002 | 5 | |
| 12 | 2013 | 4 | |
| 13 | 2019 | 4 | |
| 14 | 2022 | 3 | |
| 15 | 2021 | 2 | |
| 16 | 2022 | 1 | |
| 17 | 2019 | 1 |
About Sigrid Schmalzer
Sigrid Schmalzer is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, History and Philosophy of Science, General Agricultural and Biological Sciences, Cultural Studies and Political Science and International Relations, having authored 17 papers that have together received 283 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Chinese history and philosophy (10 papers), Historical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis (3 papers), Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development (2 papers), Diverse Historical and Scientific Studies (2 papers), History of Science and Medicine (2 papers), Japanese History and Culture (2 papers), Global Trade and Competitiveness (1 paper) and Indian Economic and Social Development (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (52 citations), General Agricultural and Biological Sciences (63 citations), Political Science and International Relations (83 citations), Anthropology (32 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (128 citations). Sigrid Schmalzer has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Gabriela Soto Laveaga and Prakash Kumar. Their work appears in journals such as Isis, Geographical Review, Agricultural History, East Asian Science Technology and Society An International Journal and Endeavour.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.