Shuli Yang

996 citations
29 papers · 480 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

Shuli Yang

26 papers receiving 467 citations

Peers

Shuli Yang
Comparison fields: 5 of 71
  • Agronomy and Crop Science 147
  • Genetics 132
  • Cell Biology 71
  • Animal Science and Zoology 42
  • Equine 6
Replace Weidong Deng with:
Weidong Deng China
Xiao Gou China
Jamal Fayazi Iran
Aixin Liang China
Mohamed S. Hassanane Egypt
Mohammad Reza Nassiry Iran
Moon-Suck Ko South Korea
K.R. McLeod United States
Otávio Rodrigues Machado Neto Brazil
Byung-Wook Cho South Korea
Shuli Yang relative to Weidong Deng China Weidong Deng's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Weidong Deng · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Shuli Yang

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Shuli Yang's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Shuli Yang with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Shuli Yang more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Shuli Yang

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Shuli Yang. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Shuli Yang. The network helps show where Shuli Yang may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Shuli Yang, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Shuli Yang Line = papers co-authored together Shuli Yang links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 29 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201168
2 200948
3 200944
4 200735
5 200730
6 201628
7 201027
8 202027
9 200623
10 201017
11 200916
12 201815
13 201914
14 201112
15 202412
16 202011
17 202410
18 20109
19 20168
20 20236

About Shuli Yang

Shuli Yang is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Agronomy and Crop Science, Genetics, Cell Biology and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, having authored 29 papers that have together received 480 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology (11 papers), melanin and skin pigmentation (6 papers), Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock (6 papers), Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies (6 papers), Plant and fungal interactions (4 papers), Gut microbiota and health (4 papers), Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques (4 papers) and Adipose Tissue and Metabolism (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Agronomy and Crop Science (147 citations), Genetics (132 citations), Cell Biology (71 citations), Animal Science and Zoology (42 citations) and Equine (6 citations). Shuli Yang has collaborated with scholars based in China, Thailand and United States. Frequent co-authors include Weidong Deng, Huaming Mao, Xiao Gou, Dongmei Xi, Huaming Mao, Xin Gou, Xiaowen Shi, Dawei Yan, Shaoxiong Lu and Hao Zhang. Their work appears in journals such as Molecular Biology Reports, PLoS ONE, Archives of Microbiology, Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part B Biochemistry and Molecular Biology and Asian Journal of Animal and Veterinary Advances.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact