Sheldon Pollock

66 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers

Sheldon Pollock
Comparison fields: 5 of 86
  • Religious studies 443
  • Anthropology 612
  • Philosophy 344
  • Political Science and International Relations 585
  • Visual Arts and Performing Arts 94
Replace Daniel Boyarín with:
Daniel Boyarín United States
Gauri Viswanathan United States
Erich Auerbach France
Karin Àjíkẹ́ Barber United Kingdom
Annemarie Schımmel United States
David Damrosch United States
Tejaswini Niranjana India
Jonathan Z. Smith United States
David Chidester South Africa
Simon D. Goldhill United Kingdom
Sheldon Pollock relative to Daniel Boyarín United States Daniel Boyarín's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3.0×
Daniel Boyarín · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Sheldon Pollock

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Sheldon Pollock's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sheldon Pollock with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sheldon Pollock more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Sheldon Pollock

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sheldon Pollock. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sheldon Pollock. The network helps show where Sheldon Pollock may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 10 scholars most cited alongside Sheldon Pollock, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Sheldon Pollock Line = papers co-authored together Sheldon Pollock links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 80 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2006356
2 2000179
3 2000169
4 1998119
5 200994
6 200586
7 199377
8 198575
9 200171
10 200267
11 200161
12 199656
13
A Rasa Reader: Classical Indian Aesthetics
201638
14 201638
15
Forms of Knowledge in Early Modern Asia: Explorations in the Intellectual History of India and Tibet, 1500-1800
201135
16 200232
17 198926
18 201820
19 199517
20 200717

About Sheldon Pollock

Sheldon Pollock is a scholar working on Religious studies, Philosophy, Anthropology, Language and Linguistics and Literature and Literary Theory, having authored 80 papers that have together received 1.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Indian and Buddhist Studies (24 papers), Indian History and Philosophy (17 papers), Eurasian Exchange Networks (9 papers), Anthropological Studies and Insights (6 papers), Chinese history and philosophy (5 papers), Historical Linguistics and Language Studies (4 papers), South Asian Studies and Conflicts (4 papers) and Postcolonial and Cultural Literary Studies (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Religious studies (443 citations), Anthropology (612 citations), Philosophy (344 citations), Political Science and International Relations (585 citations) and Visual Arts and Performing Arts (94 citations). Sheldon Pollock has collaborated with scholars based in United States and France. Frequent co-authors include Homi Κ. Bhabha, Carol Appadurai Breckenridge, John Oliver Perry, Dipesh Chakrabarty, Benjamin A. Elman, Jane Tylus, David Damrosch, Stephen Owen, Michael G. Meyer and Richard W. Lariviere. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Indian Philosophy, The Journal of Asian Studies, Comparative Studies of South Asia Africa and the Middle East, Public Culture and History and Theory.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact