Sheldon Pollock

45 papers receiving 958 citations

Peers

Sheldon Pollock
Comparison fields: 5 of 72
  • Religious studies 367
  • Anthropology 465
  • Philosophy 279
  • Political Science and International Relations 402
  • Visual Arts and Performing Arts 73
Replace Simon Goldhill with:
Simon Goldhill United Kingdom
Gauri Viswanathan United States
Sarah B. Pomeroy United States
Édouard Glissant Canada
Robert Alter United Kingdom
Barbara H. Rosenwein United States
David Kopf United States
Elaine Fantham United States
Froma I. Zeitlin United States
Charles Segal United States
Sheldon Pollock relative to Simon Goldhill United Kingdom Simon Goldhill's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.8×
Simon Goldhill · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Sheldon Pollock

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Sheldon Pollock's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sheldon Pollock with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sheldon Pollock more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Sheldon Pollock

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sheldon Pollock. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sheldon Pollock. The network helps show where Sheldon Pollock may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 9 scholars most cited alongside Sheldon Pollock, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Sheldon Pollock Line = papers co-authored together Sheldon Pollock links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 50 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2006234
2 2000129
3 2000121
4 199898
5 200581
6 200973
7 200168
8 199366
9 198558
10 200154
11
Forms of Knowledge in Early Modern Asia: Explorations in the Intellectual History of India and Tibet, 1500-1800
201134
12 201633
13
A Rasa Reader: Classical Indian Aesthetics
201629
14 198924
15 200717
16 198416
17 199513
18 201411
19 200811
20 200111

About Sheldon Pollock

Sheldon Pollock is a scholar working on Philosophy, Religious studies, Anthropology, Sociology and Political Science and Language and Linguistics, having authored 50 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Indian and Buddhist Studies (18 papers), Indian History and Philosophy (16 papers), Anthropological Studies and Insights (6 papers), Postcolonial and Cultural Literary Studies (4 papers), Study and Philosophy of Religion (3 papers), Eurasian Exchange Networks (3 papers), South Asian Studies and Conflicts (3 papers) and Chinese history and philosophy (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Religious studies (367 citations), Anthropology (465 citations), Philosophy (279 citations), Political Science and International Relations (402 citations) and Visual Arts and Performing Arts (73 citations). Sheldon Pollock has collaborated with scholars based in United States and France. Frequent co-authors include John Oliver Perry, Carol A. Breckenridge, Homi Κ. Bhabha, Benjamin A. Elman, David Damrosch, Jane Tylus, Robert P. Goldman, Michaël Meyer and Richard W. Lariviere. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Indian Philosophy, The Journal of Asian Studies, Comparative Studies of South Asia Africa and the Middle East, Public Culture and Critical Inquiry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact