Sheldon Pollock

67 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers

Sheldon Pollock
Comparison fields: 5 of 87
  • Religious studies 433
  • Anthropology 618
  • Philosophy 345
  • Political Science and International Relations 591
  • Visual Arts and Performing Arts 93
Replace Daniel Boyarín with:
Daniel Boyarín United States
Erich Auerbach United States
Gauri Viswanathan United States
Sabine MacCormack United States
David Damrosch United States
Simon Goldhill United Kingdom
James A. Brundage United States
Robin Osborne United Kingdom
Tejaswini Niranjana India
David Cressy United States
Sheldon Pollock relative to Daniel Boyarín United States Daniel Boyarín's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Daniel Boyarín · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Sheldon Pollock

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Sheldon Pollock's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sheldon Pollock with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sheldon Pollock more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Sheldon Pollock

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sheldon Pollock. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sheldon Pollock. The network helps show where Sheldon Pollock may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 11 scholars most cited alongside Sheldon Pollock, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Sheldon Pollock Line = papers co-authored together Sheldon Pollock links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 80 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2006350
2 2000181
3 2000170
4 1998120
5 200991
6 200587
7 199376
8 198572
9 200171
10 200268
11 200160
12 199654
13 201638
14
Forms of Knowledge in Early Modern Asia: Explorations in the Intellectual History of India and Tibet, 1500-1800
201137
15
A Rasa Reader: Classical Indian Aesthetics
201637
16 200233
17 198926
18 201819
19 200717
20 198417

About Sheldon Pollock

Sheldon Pollock is a scholar working on Religious studies, Philosophy, Anthropology, Sociology and Political Science and Language and Linguistics, having authored 80 papers that have together received 1.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Indian and Buddhist Studies (24 papers), Indian History and Philosophy (18 papers), Eurasian Exchange Networks (9 papers), Anthropological Studies and Insights (6 papers), Chinese history and philosophy (5 papers), Translation Studies and Practices (4 papers), Historical Linguistics and Language Studies (4 papers) and Postcolonial and Cultural Literary Studies (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Religious studies (433 citations), Anthropology (618 citations), Philosophy (345 citations), Political Science and International Relations (591 citations) and Visual Arts and Performing Arts (93 citations). Sheldon Pollock has collaborated with scholars based in United States, France and India. Frequent co-authors include Homi Κ. Bhabha, Carol A. Breckenridge, John Oliver Perry, Dipesh Chakrabarty, Benjamin A. Elman, David Damrosch, Jane Tylus, Robert P. Goldman, Stephen Owen and Richard W. Lariviere. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Indian Philosophy, The Journal of Asian Studies, Comparative Studies of South Asia Africa and the Middle East, Public Culture and Critical Inquiry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact