Shaoping Wu

24 papers receiving 843 citations

Peers

Shaoping Wu
Comparison fields: 5 of 97
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 270
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 23
  • Biological Psychiatry 13
  • Nutrition and Dietetics 62
  • Infectious Diseases 72
Replace Xing Yang with:
Xing Yang China
Ana Leda F. Longhini Brazil
Misa Hirose Germany
Fumitaka Sato United States
Federica Pierucci Italy
Manuella Bouttier Canada
Monika Linke Austria
Ben Hatano Japan
Chi‐Ruei Huang Taiwan
Jarosław Jóźwiak Poland
Shaoping Wu relative to Xing Yang China Xing Yang's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3.1×
Xing Yang · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Shaoping Wu

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Shaoping Wu's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Shaoping Wu with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Shaoping Wu more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Shaoping Wu

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Shaoping Wu. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Shaoping Wu. The network helps show where Shaoping Wu may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Shaoping Wu, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Shaoping Wu Line = papers co-authored together Shaoping Wu links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 25 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2010203
2 2013158
3
Vitamin D, vitamin D receptor, and macroautophagy in inflammation and infection.
2011142
4 201191
5 201546
6 201443
7 201443
8 202229
9 201222
10 201421
11 201615
12 20219
13 20208
14 20156
15 20134
16 20234
17 20233
18 20242
19 20232
20 20212

About Shaoping Wu

Shaoping Wu is a scholar working on Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Epidemiology, Genetics, Insect Science and Infectious Diseases, having authored 25 papers that have together received 859 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Vitamin D Research Studies (5 papers), Insect Utilization and Effects (2 papers), Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (2 papers), Cardiovascular and exercise physiology (2 papers), Tuberculosis Research and Epidemiology (2 papers), Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (2 papers), Microscopic Colitis (2 papers) and Autophagy in Disease and Therapy (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pathology and Forensic Medicine (270 citations), Geriatrics and Gerontology (23 citations), Biological Psychiatry (13 citations), Nutrition and Dietetics (62 citations) and Infectious Diseases (72 citations). Shaoping Wu has collaborated with scholars based in China, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Jun Sun, Yinglin Xia, R. Balfour Sartor, Anne P. Liao, Jiandong Li, Yan Chun Li, Isaac K. Sundar, Irfan Rahman, Rong Lu and Jianwen Que. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, Cell stem cell, Pathogens and Disease, Age and Ageing and Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact