Shaochen Wang

506 citations
21 papers · 407 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

Shaochen Wang

20 papers receiving 402 citations

Peers

Shaochen Wang
Comparison fields: 5 of 58
  • Molecular Medicine 128
  • Pollution 194
  • Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 16
  • Biotechnology 36
  • Endocrinology 15
Replace Sara Gharavi with:
Sara Gharavi Iran
Jana L. Markley United States
Swapnil Gaikwad India
Geneviève Labbé Canada
Anca Farkas Romania
Hélène Guilloteau France
Emmanuela Marchi Italy
Yonghong Li China
Thomas Jäger Germany
Banu Kaşkatepe Türkiye
Shaochen Wang relative to Sara Gharavi Iran Sara Gharavi's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Sara Gharavi · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Shaochen Wang

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Shaochen Wang's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Shaochen Wang with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Shaochen Wang more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Shaochen Wang

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Shaochen Wang. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Shaochen Wang. The network helps show where Shaochen Wang may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Shaochen Wang, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Shaochen Wang Line = papers co-authored together Shaochen Wang links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 21 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2012127
2 2013110
3 201741
4 201826
5 202026
6 201316
7 200914
8 201310
9 20225
10 20155
11 20234
12 20224
13 20224
14 20224
15 20213
16 20253
17 20222
18 20231
19 20251
20 20251

About Shaochen Wang

Shaochen Wang is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Biomedical Engineering, Ecology, Molecular Medicine and Biotechnology, having authored 21 papers that have together received 407 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Biofuel production and bioconversion (6 papers), Bacteriophages and microbial interactions (4 papers), Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria (4 papers), Enzyme Production and Characterization (4 papers), Microbial Metabolites in Food Biotechnology (3 papers), Pharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental Impacts (3 papers), Enzyme Catalysis and Immobilization (3 papers) and Microbial Natural Products and Biosynthesis (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Molecular Medicine (128 citations), Pollution (194 citations), Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (16 citations), Biotechnology (36 citations) and Endocrinology (15 citations). Shaochen Wang has collaborated with scholars based in China, United States and Russia. Frequent co-authors include Yongning Wu, Jianzhong Shen, Bing Shao, Juan Li, Juan Li, Thanh Wang, Zhiyang Feng, Mingming Cao, Congming Wu and Li‐Xing Zhao. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Applied Microbiology, Frontiers in Microbiology, Nano Letters, Organic Letters and Analytica Chimica Acta.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact